Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(128,535 posts)
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 01:56 AM Monday

Maybe it is time to attach conditions to blue states subsidizing red ones.

Maybe it's time to attach strings to the subsidization of red states, like critical reasoning taught in all grades, more civics classes, and higher pay for better-credentialed teachers -- not out of largesse but to protect the rest of us.

#enlightenedselfinterest

Chris Dorman (@chrisdorman.bsky.social) 2025-09-28T17:31:24.828Z
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to applegrove (Original post)

Ms. Toad

(37,778 posts)
3. It doesn't work that way.
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 08:01 AM
Monday

Once the money is paid in taxes, the federal government chooses how to spend it. You see how well that is going. (And since individuals pay the taxes, just now paying the taxes is not a strategy that many radiates are willing to implement . . . See how many people were willing to withhold war taxes)

MichMan

(16,037 posts)
4. Since individuals and not states pay Federal taxes, this map seems to indicate that blue state taxpayers are wealthier
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 08:13 AM
Monday

and are paying more than their fair share. That would align with per capita incomes in those states, which means the wealthy are subsidizing the poor. Isn't that how the tax system is designed?

Should income taxes on the wealthy be cut, or should they be raised on their poorer counterparts to even things out more?

Is that the goal that it is trying to show?

MichMan

(16,037 posts)
9. But, IRS tax tables don't factor in cost of living and there aren't separate tax tables for each state.
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 02:15 PM
Monday

Per capita income in California is $85,518 compared to $56,684 in Alabama. Naturally, California residents contribute more to the US Treasury in personal income taxes than Alabamians do.

Cities are no different. I can safely assume that Beverly Hills residents pay substantially more in taxes to California than those that live in Compton. Yet no one is saying that Compton residents aren't paying their fair share, and Bevery Hills is getting the short end of the stick.

Seems like the OP is suggesting that each state's residents should pay the same total amount in income taxes, regardless of income, which would be ridiculous.

boston bean

(36,814 posts)
6. Them red states should be paying their fair share. Isn't that the Trump way?
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 08:19 AM
Monday

I mean just say it. Don’t actually do it. Us blue states are being robbed blind.

Torchlight

(5,788 posts)
8. I think Mr. Dorman has gazed into the abyss a little too long
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 02:02 PM
Monday

Fighting fire with fire is great... if the goal is to burn everything down.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe it is time to attac...