General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho recruited Platner and why was he not vetted?
We have very important elections coming up in two weeks and all the focus instead is on a very problematic Senate candidate for an election happening in 2026.
elleng
(141,357 posts)Wiz Imp
(7,852 posts)because he thought he could win. There didn't need to be anyone else involved in the decision, and as far as I know, there wasn't.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,449 posts)JustAnotherGen
(37,328 posts)But there's only outrage when its the magapubs.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,449 posts)I saw a Black person on Twitter say that Black people are poor tippers because it's a residue of slavery. I never heard anything like that. I lived with a Black family for six months and would go out to eat with them. They always tipped and tipped quite well (25% +). In fact, the patriarch was aware of all the tropes and actively defied them. He would tip large, listen to country music, and hunt.
JustAnotherGen
(37,328 posts)Beware of false Black folks on these apps. Search *Digital Blackface* on Threads . . . you'll start to see their patterns.
rogue emissary
(3,321 posts). . . So it's cool.
H2O Man
(78,161 posts)Quiet Em
(2,414 posts)Democrats have momentum and the public on their side and two Governor seats at stake and this guy is sucking all the oxygen out of the room in a very negative way. He was clearly not vetted.
H2O Man
(78,161 posts)think is responsible for "vetting" a person who runs in a campaign? Generally, "vetting" is what, for example, a candidate for president has done in deciding who will be her/his choice to run on the ticket, or a president select for a position that must have Senate confirmation. The idea of some group "vetting" who can or should run sounds rather close to the old, smoke-filled rooms of yester year.
In elections, of course, it is the voters who have either "vetted" a candidate, unless they simply vote party line. But considering that there are now more registered independents in the country than in either major party, I think more voters do the vetting.
Who do you hold responsible for not doing this vetting?
Quiet Em
(2,414 posts)likeable candidate.
I'm not going to waste another thought on this guy.
All my attention is going to Mikie Sherrill, Abigail Spanberger and Zohran Mamdani for the next two weeks.
H2O Man
(78,161 posts)Raven123
(7,231 posts)Same story different day in politics. Honeymoon is over.
Torchlight
(6,022 posts)It allows us to separate the chaff and the wheat prior to any problematic candidates begin to speak for us. Granted, it can weaken and even fail at times, but more often than not I'm of the opinion that a goal of the primaries is to work out the very concerns you voice is achieved by its very process.
Cha
(315,396 posts)Instead of in the General.
And Thank Goodness Gov Janet Mills Got into the Race for Senator from Maine!
JustAnotherGen
(37,328 posts)340 Million Americans. And within that number - there's this guy.
Primaries are Healthy.
leftstreet
(37,859 posts)The better question might be, why has Collins been in office for what? 30 years and the Democratic party hasn't found anyone strong enough to win?
hmm
GreenWave
(11,866 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(172,000 posts)Once a Senate candidate reaches the point at which he has to deny being a secret Nazi, his campaign isnt quite where it should be.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/maines-graham-platner-faces-difficult-questions-record-tattoo-rcna239152
The first sign of trouble came to the fore last week, when Politico reported that Platner once suggested in online posts that violence is a necessary means to achieving social change. Around the same time, CNN reported on since-deleted comments Platner had made online in which he once called himself a communist, dismissed all police as bastards, and said rural White Americans actually are racist and stupid.
The candidate disavowed his earlier rhetoric, but other revelations soon followed. Indeed, also last week, The Bangor Daily News reported that Platner also posted messages online in which he asked why Black people dont tip and suggested people concerned about being raped shouldnt be inebriated around people they dont feel comfortable with.
After that report reached the public, Platners political director resigned.
That was late last week. This week, we learned about the Senate hopefuls choice in tattoos. Politico reported:
Democratic Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner expressed regret over getting a tattoo that appears similar to a Nazi symbol nearly two decades ago and plans to have it removed, his latest mea culpa after a week of damning headlines over resurfaced social media posts. ... Platner reiterated that he got the tattoo while out drinking with fellow Marines in Croatia, choosing the skull and crossbones off a wall at the tattoo parlor. He said the similarity to Nazi iconography never came up, including when he underwent physical exams mandated by the U.S. Army, which prohibits tattoos of identified hate symbols.
In other words, Platners defense is that he didnt know he had a tattoo on his chest that resembles a Nazi symbol. Whats more, on Wednesday morning, he and his team said the image has now been covered......
Whether or not thats true, once a Senate candidate reaches the point at which he has to deny being a secret Nazi, his campaign isnt quite where it should be.
Democratic officials had already started rallying behind Mills, who has said shell only serve one term if elected. In light of the revelations about Platners record, its likely that party support will intensify. Watch this space.
Retrograde
(11,330 posts)Is he endorsed by the Democratic party? Voters in Maine have several months to decide whether they want him as their cy
Susan Calvin
(2,378 posts)I think his campaign is dead, or should be.
https://www.advocate.com/politics/graham-platner-homophobic-posts#toggle-gdpr