General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeggy Noonan: A Lament for the Washington Post
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/a-lament-for-the-washington-post-a5509d63No paywall link
https://archive.li/WMkX4
The diminishment of the Washington Post hits hard because it feels like another demoralizing thing in our national life. Our public life as a nationhow we are together, how we talk to each other, the sound of usisnt what it was. Its gone down and we all feel this, all the grown-ups.
The Post was a pillar. The sweeping layoffs and narrowing of coverage announced this week followed years of buyouts and shrinking sections. None of this feels like the restructuring of a paper or a rearranging of priorities, but like the doing-in of a paper, a great one, a thing of journalistic grandeur from some point in the 1960s through some point in the 2020s. I feel it damaged itself when, under the pressure of the pandemic, George Floyd and huge technological and journalistic changes, it wobbledand not in the opinion section but on the news side. But I kept my subscription because that is a way of trusting, of giving a great paper time to steady itself. (And there would always be an important David Ignatius column, or a great scoop on some governmental scandal that made it worth the cost.)
But the Posts diminishment, which looks like its demise, isnt just a media story. Reaction shouldnt break down along ideological lines, in which the left feels journalism is its precinct and is sad, and the right feels journalism is its hulking enemy and isnt sad. Treat it that way and well fail to see the story for its true significance. The capital of the most powerful nation on earth appears to be without a vital, fully functioning newspaper to cover it. That isnt the occasion of jokes, its a disaster.
I fear sometimes that few people really care about journalism, but we are dead without it. Someday something bad will happen, something terrible on a national scale, and the thing well need most, literally to survive, is information. Reliable informationa way to get it, and then to get it to the public. That is what journalism is, getting the information.
*snip*
harumph
(3,126 posts)that got us to this point in the first place. You asked for it - you got it - fas-ci-sm! (Sung to the tune of the old Toyota jingle).
BeyondGeography
(40,937 posts)What I remember about her among other things was she spent Barack Obamas entire presidency stamping her feet in objection. And if she said a single critical word about the mindless partisanship of her beloved Republican Party toward Obamas frequent attempts to work with them I missed it.
yorkster
(3,724 posts)of us" give me the old Noonan cringe.
But I am glad she wrote this.article.
pandr32
(13,935 posts)Those pillars of journalism are controlled by money--not purpose. We can no longer trust our morning paper or our official media channels.
Yet, information is getting out to the People. We are networking in other ways.
RandySF
(82,155 posts)Ritabert
(2,144 posts)Cheerleader for Reagan whose regime started it all.
betsuni
(28,891 posts)Gone with the wind, she thinks, gone with the wind, emptying the martini glass.
I wonder what the "wobbling" was that she didn't care for. Must have been too vulgar for the grown-ups.
gulliver
(13,806 posts)WaPo has been a great paper. I just don't think it works at scale now. All the talented people who work there are going to want to be influencers on YouTube, X, and substack.
A gig at WaPo doesn't get you the prestige and clout it once did. Everybody has heard of CBS, so they may be able to shed the deadwood and become a force. CBS still has broadcast reach, for one thing. Very few people know about WaPo being important.
