Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceWave

(3,049 posts)
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 06:43 PM 16 hrs ago

Reality is that Iran under Khamenei was a brutal place for women. Today represents a chance for them to finally be free.

Gender Apartheid in Iran is Crushing Women’s Lives and Futures

March 6, 2025 — In Iran, women are second-class citizens—systematically oppressed by laws and policies that serve only one purpose: to entrench the power of the government. For over four decades, the Islamic Republic has restricted women’s rights in marriage, divorce, inheritance, child custody, work, the courts, political office, travel, lifestyle, and clothing—using their bodies and freedoms as tools of domination—and has blatantly failed to protect women from gender-based violence.

As the Iranian government escalates its systematic assault on women’s fundamental rights and solidifies a discriminatory system that can only be described as gender apartheid, the urgent need to criminalize gender-based violations of international law has never been greater, the Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) said today.

“The oppression of women in Iran is not just discrimination—it is a deliberately designed, institutionalized system of domination intended to enforce the subjugation of women to maintain the state’s grip on power. This state-sanctioned systematic subjugation amounts to nothing less than gender apartheid, which fully meets the threshold of a crime against humanity,” said Bahar Ghandehari, the director of communications at CHRI.

https://iranhumanrights.org/2025/03/gender-apartheid-in-iran-is-crushing-womens-lives-and-futures/
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reality is that Iran under Khamenei was a brutal place for women. Today represents a chance for them to finally be free. (Original Post) PeaceWave 16 hrs ago OP
A slim chance, alas. For this war is not being waged to liberate women. Mister Ed 16 hrs ago #1
Women in Afghanistan have it much worse VMA131Marine 16 hrs ago #2
You're kidding right? Women in Iran have - for decades - needed permission from their husbands to obtain a passport. PeaceWave 16 hrs ago #3
I know an Iranian woman who has regularly travelled between the US and Iran VMA131Marine 16 hrs ago #5
If she is married then, per Iranian law, she required her husband's permission... PeaceWave 16 hrs ago #6
But still better than those in Saudi. VMA131Marine 11 hrs ago #20
Maybe so but there are important differences fujiyamasan 16 hrs ago #10
Woman are executed in Iran and sentenced to prior rape, so that they cannot go to paradise. Melon 11 hrs ago #21
Bad comparison. Most Iranian men support women being free. Iranians are mostly liberal JI7 15 hrs ago #19
Who will save the women in fascist red states who face being put to death for miscarriages? nt yaesu 16 hrs ago #4
Or it could be replaced by an even more oppressive regime. viva la 16 hrs ago #7
Only in the fantasies of warmongers does it represent that. The CIA's assessment was very different. RockRaven 16 hrs ago #8
warmongers and their enablers Skittles 15 hrs ago #15
sure, and monkeys might fly out of my butt WhiskeyGrinder 16 hrs ago #9
I am really sick of that whitewasher Skittles 15 hrs ago #17
Irani women may be in worse shape if the replacement is more hardliner. sinkingfeeling 16 hrs ago #11
And Venezuelans are now free, right? SamuelTheThird 15 hrs ago #12
Reality is that's not what's happening at all. Iggo 15 hrs ago #13
LOL Skittles 15 hrs ago #14
I think we can calm down about which country is a brutal place for women. Hope22 15 hrs ago #16
Here is a con supporting woman from Oklahoma City discussing how great(sarcasm) everything is right now. Quiet Em 15 hrs ago #18
Ali Larijani is probably the next Supreme Leader. roamer65 10 hrs ago #22
"Today represents a chance for them to finally be free." LudwigPastorius 10 hrs ago #23

Mister Ed

(6,898 posts)
1. A slim chance, alas. For this war is not being waged to liberate women.
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 06:46 PM
16 hrs ago

The women of Afghanistan were similarly oppressed, and sadly remain so twenty years after our invasion.

VMA131Marine

(5,240 posts)
2. Women in Afghanistan have it much worse
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 06:50 PM
16 hrs ago

than Iranian women.

And let’s not forget one of our “allies” in this, Saudi Arabia has an abysmal record when it comes to women’s rights; at least as bad as Iran’s if not even worse. Iranian women can travel unaccompanied, not so for Saudi women.

PeaceWave

(3,049 posts)
3. You're kidding right? Women in Iran have - for decades - needed permission from their husbands to obtain a passport.
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 06:53 PM
16 hrs ago

PeaceWave

(3,049 posts)
6. If she is married then, per Iranian law, she required her husband's permission...
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 06:58 PM
16 hrs ago

But, this is beside the point. The conditions women have been living in under Khamenei have been insane and getting worse as time went on.

fujiyamasan

(1,507 posts)
10. Maybe so but there are important differences
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:07 PM
16 hrs ago

Iran was, even under the ayatollah, a better place for women than Afghanistan.

Iranian women can get an education even at the university level and women have led the way for more freedom for years now. Iran is also much more urbanized than Afghanistan. The two countries are very different culturally.

Not sure why any of this matters. We didn’t go into Afghanistan because the taliban treated women badly. The same here. Women may end up better off. That’s great, but it wasn’t our responsibility to go in and depose their leader. I hate to say it, it’s cold but the fate of Iranian women’s human rights doesn’t impact most Americans lives anyways. I’m more concerned about the brutality of ICE and the pedo president we have.

Melon

(1,307 posts)
21. Woman are executed in Iran and sentenced to prior rape, so that they cannot go to paradise.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 12:01 AM
11 hrs ago

There is always something worse is a disgustingly low bar to achieve. Iran treats woman horribly.

JI7

(93,451 posts)
19. Bad comparison. Most Iranian men support women being free. Iranians are mostly liberal
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:51 PM
15 hrs ago

We don't know what will happen but the comparisons to other Islamic countries don't work.

I would say there is a bigger chance of something like what happened in Russia happening. Things involving corrupt elites and businesses and other shit .

yaesu

(9,204 posts)
4. Who will save the women in fascist red states who face being put to death for miscarriages? nt
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 06:54 PM
16 hrs ago

RockRaven

(19,051 posts)
8. Only in the fantasies of warmongers does it represent that. The CIA's assessment was very different.
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:05 PM
16 hrs ago
Exclusive: Prior to Iran attacks, CIA assessed Khamenei could be replaced by hardline IRGC elements if killed, sources say
----------
WASHINGTON, Feb 28 (Reuters) - In the run-up to the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Saturday, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency assessed that even if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in the operation, he could be replaced by hardline figures from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), two sources briefed on the intelligence said.

The agency's assessments, which were produced over the past two weeks, looked broadly at what could occur in Iran following a U.S. intervention and the extent to which a military operation could trigger regime change in the Islamic Republic -- now a pronounced objective for Washington.

IRGC figures taking power was among the multiple different scenarios that emerged, a third source familiar with the matter said.


It continues:
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/prior-iran-attacks-cia-assessed-khamenei-would-be-replaced-by-hardline-irgc-2026-02-28/

Iggo

(49,840 posts)
13. Reality is that's not what's happening at all.
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:17 PM
15 hrs ago

Trump attacked a country because he’s down in the polls and people just won’t let go of this Epstein thing. His SOTU was shit. His attempt to glom onto the hockey gold medal was shit. His tariffs are shit. His invasion of Minneapolis was shit. His rubber stamp congress is shit. Even the support from his foaming at the mouth racist base is turning to shit. War is the only way out of this. So now we’re in a war.

Nothing about this is saving the women of Iran.

Skittles

(170,733 posts)
14. LOL
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:20 PM
15 hrs ago

repukes don't give a fuck about women in AMERICA, let alone anywhere else in the world

Hope22

(4,624 posts)
16. I think we can calm down about which country is a brutal place for women.
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:22 PM
15 hrs ago

In the US It appears that no harm no foul if young girls are raped and used as sex slaves. Don’t worry about going to jail boys. As long as you have the cash in your pockets. Somehow our rights to control our own bodies has been snatched from our existence. Zygotes have first right to the hosts body. Now the right to vote for non male citizens is under direct attack. The list goes on and on. The history of the US and close inspection of what is going on here today should put the spotlight on this country as a hostile place to navigate as a female. It starts at the top but lives in the dark corners of the male hearts groomed over time by the system.

Quiet Em

(2,769 posts)
18. Here is a con supporting woman from Oklahoma City discussing how great(sarcasm) everything is right now.
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:43 PM
15 hrs ago
At 11 p.m. PST on Friday, she shared that sirens were sounding throughout Israel, and that people were advised to seek shelter, and that they could not cross into Jordan. She requested prayers for their safety.

At 1 a.m. PST, she shared, “I am just a little farm girl from [southwest Missouri] right in the middle of the forthcoming war in the Middle East. Warnings and sirens are going off again. The 2 main targets are Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. I am near Jerusalem in a shelter. I’m just a little girl from [southwest Missouri] who is scared to death. The airport is closed down, and I can’t get to Jordan. I am in God’s hands.”

In a post an hour later, she shared pictures of the bomb shelter she was in: “It is all concrete and cold,” she said. “Lord, I want to be with my family. I am beyond scared.”

Just minutes later, she posted that people were rushing into the bomb shelter and that it was chaos. She said that she had learned that fear is a universal language.

At 5 a.m. PST, she updated her followers that the border crossing to Jordan was in fact closed. As a result, they would need to travel approximately five hours by bus to the next available crossing, though there was no certainty that it would be open. She also mentioned that they might need to drive to Cairo, which is nine hours away, and that the situation was changing by the minute.

Two hours later, she reported that Jordan was being bombed, so they were leaving immediately for an undisclosed location, where they hoped to find refuge. She asked for prayers and support for her family, her husband, and her two children.


https://fox40.com/news/national-and-world-news/missouri-woman-trapped-israel-iran-conflict/

LudwigPastorius

(14,504 posts)
23. "Today represents a chance for them to finally be free."
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 01:00 AM
10 hrs ago

Yes, represents a chance, meaning it is symbolic, but ONLY symbolic because there are still 100,000 clerics in Iranian government...national, regional, and local.

And, there is still the Revolutionary Guard and its militias which protect and prop up those theocrats. Instigating a true revolution is a lot more involved than just capping the guy at the top.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reality is that Iran unde...