General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump May Remove Millions of Americans' Access to Their Bank Accounts
Trump May Remove Millions of Americans Access to Their Bank Accounts
https://open.substack.com/pub/rawstory/p/trump-may-take-away-millions-of-americans?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3aksq
The Trump administration is moving forward on an executive order that would require banks to collect citizenship documentation from their customers. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed its already in process.
Republican Senator Tom Cotton is cheering this on, writing to the Treasury Department to push for a review of rules that let undocumented people access the banking system. But heres the part that doesnt get said enough: this wouldnt just affect undocumented immigrants.
Banking experts are warning that this order could strip millions of ordinary Americans of their bank accounts. Think about who doesnt have a passport. According to American Banker, only about half of the U.S. population does. In West Virginia, its about two in ten. And the ten states with the lowest passport rates, all below 37 percent, voted for Trump in the last three elections.
.......
The details of the order still arent clear, including exactly what documents will be required, how exceptions would work, and what happens to people with incomplete records. But the direction is clear enough: a lot of Americans, including a lot of Trump voters, could find themselves suddenly without a bank account.
The Madcap
(1,941 posts)Sounds like a government-forced bank run to me....
Very dangerous.
VMA131Marine
(5,291 posts)What does this mean for permanent residents, international students, and people here on temporary visas?
LisaL
(47,459 posts)We have a lot of legal non-citizens in this country. Are they now not allowed to have a bank account?
mwmisses4289
(4,368 posts)where they have to have american bank accounts to do business?
I can't even shake my head anymore at this admins sheer stupidity.
Initech
(108,922 posts)RT Atlanta
(2,760 posts)cant access your money means, effectively, can't live (you know, buy food, pay rent, take care of your children etc.) will be real easy to sweep those 'undesirables' into a debtors prison/ice hotel.
Response to RT Atlanta (Reply #4)
Boomerproud This message was self-deleted by its author.
samplegirl
(14,034 posts)durablend
(9,299 posts)Figured they'd start confiscating bank accounts sooner or later.
bamagal62
(4,515 posts)no_hypocrisy
(55,046 posts)give the banks your personal information in order to even have an account?
I'm pretty sure you had to show a drivers license.
dickthegrouch
(4,564 posts)A court case is necessary for every single appropriation of our money.
No E.O can achieve that.
Any judge that says anything different deserves instant incarceration with the Felon in Chief.
rzemanfl
(31,409 posts)I am 78 years-old and if the star on my driver's license isn't enough proof, I will do a sit-down strike in the damn bank.
FalloutShelter
(14,520 posts)Last month I went to renew my non driving ID and apply for an enhanced ID and they rejected my state issued birth certificate.
They told me that NJ changed some law a couple of years ago and I have to get a new birth certificate.
NOW
I need a passport to access MY money?
Where am I? Am I voting in Paris? Am I going to the bank on Paris?
Imagine how many SS checks they can steal with this gambit. WTAF?
rzemanfl
(31,409 posts)The one I had I got in order to prove I was eleven, not twelve, on trips when that made a difference in fares back in 1959.
MerryBlooms
(12,321 posts)Proceed... war mongering, economy destroying, pedo!
Can't, pay any bills, trump canceled my auto pay 😂
I probably am one a them last feral check writers in the wild... Plus, never signed up for direct deposit, because I didn't want the state fn with my credit union account. I was an administrator for years and dealt with payroll screw ups from third party paycheck deposits. I get my check by paper 3 days later than my direct deposit union sisters. I'm good.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,421 posts)Nobody else does either because it was ignored,
MerryBlooms
(12,321 posts)Same account all this time. About 7 years ago, I went through really hard times, missed One payment. They doubled my monthly payment. When I was flush with money, I paid off monthly. But, you need a credit card to do anything. You can't even rent a hotel room for an appointment at OHSU in Portland, without a credit card.
These credit card companies are vultures. How does trump think this is going to work?
Fiendish Thingy
(23,421 posts)It will be blocked by the courts, just like all his other moronic EOs.
Unless the EO references a specific law passed by congress, I dont think banks have any oblito follow them.
maxrandb
(17,455 posts)We have learned fucking nothing, and we're GOING TO FUCKING LEARN IT AGAIN!
cbabe
(6,684 posts)Also previous post with comments:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143650035
spanone
(141,787 posts)But now...
Response to applegrove (Original post)
anciano This message was self-deleted by its author.
Takket
(23,740 posts)the premise of this is to make it impossible for immigrants without proof of citizenship to hold a job. since no one pays in cash anymore. not to mention without a bank account you can't make large purchases like homes.
The good news: Such an executive order is DOA in the courts.
LisaL
(47,459 posts)Never mind a bunch of foreign students who are here legally.
Having a bank account never required citizenship.
live love laugh
(16,425 posts)Vinca
(54,113 posts)Lovie777
(23,170 posts)also another attempted disastrous move by the dumbest greediest group of morons in this current administration ever.
niyad
(132,953 posts)taxi
(2,732 posts)There is reason to believe that the banks would rebel against this and not allow it. That reasoning is based on thinking that the banks do not want to lose customers. To be perfectly honest here, the question may be asked a little bit differently - Would the banks object to losing customers if they didn't lose the money the customers have on deposit? Let's face it, the banks will be fine with that.
We can look a little deeper than the money that is on deposit by undocumented parties. With automated payroll systems and direct deposit of wages the bank not only keeps the deposited money, but the next who-knows-how-many next paychecks for these same customers, whether they are citizens or not depending on the documentation they can provide.
I know what I would do right now. If this grift isn't enough to start a run on the banks then there never will be one.
Martin68
(27,864 posts)liberalla
(11,147 posts)Absolutely ridiculous!