Nigel Farage is a dangerous demagogue--here's how to stop him

[Celerity]

The Reform leader and his media cheerleaders have cynically exploited the murder of Henry Nowak.

https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/uk/73749/henry-nowak-nigel-farage-dangerous-demagogue

https://archive.ph/ezDhg



Nigel Farage is right about one thing. The tragic murder of Henry Nowak is a defining moment for this country. In all other respects, Farage is almost certainly dangerously and maliciously wrong. But he has the extreme good fortune of effectively having his own TV station to amplify his insensitive populist ranting, along with a tribe of nodding journalists who seem to have forgotten the basics of their trade. So the defining moment is this: whether we allow a talented demagogue to bamboozle us into becoming a different sort of country, one where rage counts for more than evidence. Or whether we can recover a sense of patient decency rooted in a respect for facts.

Let’s start with such facts as are currently available. On 3rd December last year, Nowak, a bright young student at Southampton University, was murdered by a lying, weapons-obsessed 22-year-old, Vickrum Digwa, who happens to be a Sikh. It’s worth reading the account of what happened, as described in fastidious detail by the judge, William Mousley KC. The attending officers “honestly believed” Digwa’s story that he, not Nowak, was the victim. They had been given a “convincing but wholly false narrative”. The police made serious errors that night, but Judge Mousley, who obviously heard all the evidence, did not criticise them. “These police officers were faced with having to make quick decisions in pressurised circumstances about the best way to act.”

Mousley’s contempt was reserved for Digwa and the lies which compounded his murderous actions. But never mind the judge. Along comes the demagogue—aided and abetted by his cheerleaders in the media—to declare that he has a unique insight into the events of that evening. In an “emergency address”, Farage said that Nowak’s death showed that “the rights and privileges of white people matter less than those of ethnic minorities”, and linked the incident to wider concerns over immigration, integration and diversity policies.

The main lesson from this incident, said the Reform leader—speaking, he said, in “pure cold rage”—was that we had to end “anti-white prejudice and DEI programmes in the police”. His words found echoes with Elon Musk, Tommy Robinson and from Donald Trump’s State Department, which astonishingly announced that the case was a symptom of two-tier policing and—wait for it—“civilisational decline”. There followed riots on the streets of Southampton. Who to believe: the judge, Donald Trump or Nigel Farage? Are we dealing with bad decisions taken by police officers in chaotic circumstances, or anti-white prejudice?

snip

[B.See]

1. Demagogues like Farage, Trump...

Hitler...et al... go by the same handbook: diversion and distraction from their own shortcomings via the demonization of some minority.

[anamnua]

2. Farage is Trump's

mini me.

[muriel_volestrangler]

3. Unfortunately, there really isn't anything there on "how to stop him"

"Do better journalism, like mentioning the Casey report on the Met" is about it - and that's a little, but not much. "Appoint a better head of OFCOM" - well, maybe - I can't say I know much about the board, and can't say if they'll be good or bad. But Rusbridger really doesn't offer a way forward,

[Passages]

4. Union Leaders Reject Nigel Farage's Call For Them To Back Reform UK

Kevin Schofield
Updated Tue, 9 June 2026

3 min read
https://nz.news.yahoo.com/union-leaders-reject-nigel-farage-110026882.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAMLAbX3zA0doDQElA67grBYMb15Co11jOksISLxnQepZcT916iCI7ff9P3-CJcr9Qgr-cMUEwFn9NRQbYGOsWD-jnvNw4mDN6e-Cpnp6Vt504_LMxte93twkFCglkZTsf96TvQFKvIRZFXQzNTzjqo73QWifsjxH6ofpSCJ7uW82