General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums" Hard to see what military advantage would outweigh robbing 20k people of drinking water."
I can't find anything about this.
Angry
@angrystaffer.bsky.social
· 17h
If true, I have serious concerns about this being a war crime.
Under the laws of armed conflict:
Proportionality: the military advantage has to outweigh the anticipated civilian harm.
Hard to see what military advantage would outweigh robbing 20k people of drinking water.
If true, I have serious concerns about this being a war crime.
— Angry (@angrystaffer.bsky.social) 2026-06-10T15:58:10.401Z
Under the laws of armed conflict:
Proportionality: the military advantage has to outweigh the anticipated civilian harm.
Hard to see what military advantage would outweigh robbing 20k people of drinking water.
Whip-poor-will
(587 posts)run by a sicko...good luck
dem4decades
(14,588 posts)Lonestarblue
(13,598 posts)flvegan
(66,620 posts)as a "military advantage" most likely.
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,296 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,418 posts)Along with collaborators in their administration.
Hope22
(4,952 posts)If they did drop these bombs they are responsible for the crimes against the people. They were duty bound to refuse an illegal mission.
modrepub
(4,235 posts)But US or Israeli strikes? Or US strikes at the direction of Israel? Either way, same purpose, cruelty.