Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat a total f*ck you
Two cherry pickers and a scissors lift. That's what it took to put the name up there.
To take it down, it seems, is an infinite process.
You certainly need scaffolding 10 feet higher than the work area.
The regime hired these workers. That's who they're getting their orders from.
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What a total f*ck you (Original Post)
dpibel
6 hrs ago
OP
I did see they asked for a 12 hour extension and attest it will be done by early hours the 13th
Hassin Bin Sober
6 hrs ago
#8
RockRaven
(19,889 posts)1. The putting up was "do it ASAP before somebody stops us" and the taking down
is foot dragging, pouty malicious compliance.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,540 posts)2. Yeah, probably foot dragging.
But maybe they have to replace some granite to not leave holes in the facade. Which would make it more involved than a couple guys with a level and a hammer drill.
Shellback Squid
(10,204 posts)7. solid reason
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,540 posts)8. I did see they asked for a 12 hour extension and attest it will be done by early hours the 13th
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287972/gov.uscourts.dcd.287972.58.0_1.pdf
MOTION FOR TWELVE-HOUR EXTENSION TO
COURTS JUNE 12 COMPLIANCE DEADLINE
Defendants respectfully request a brief extension of time to file the compliance declaration
required by this Courts May 29, 2026 permanent-injunction order (see ECF No. 49), as one task
the removal of signage from the Centers front portico that purports to rename the Kennedy
Center after President Trump, id.has been delayed because of thunderstorms in the District of
Columbia that presented safety concerns for workers. See Ex. A. The removal work is presently
ongoing, and Defendants expect it will conclude in the early hours of the morning of June 13,
2026. Id. Defendants respectfully request a short extension of timeuntil noon on June 13, 2026
to file their compliance declaration. Defendants reached out to Plaintiff when it became clear late
in the evening of June 12 that progress on removal of the letters had been sufficiently hindered to
threaten the midnight compliance deadline.
Plaintiff provided the following position statement:
Plaintiffs position is that Defendants had two weeks to comply with the order, and
only need an extension because of their inexcusable delay. Plaintiff also has
concerns that this fits a patten of non-compliance on Defendants part. But under
the circumstances, Plaintiff takes no position on a 12 hour extension. Plaintiff
would strongly oppose any further extensions.
MOTION FOR TWELVE-HOUR EXTENSION TO
COURTS JUNE 12 COMPLIANCE DEADLINE
Defendants respectfully request a brief extension of time to file the compliance declaration
required by this Courts May 29, 2026 permanent-injunction order (see ECF No. 49), as one task
the removal of signage from the Centers front portico that purports to rename the Kennedy
Center after President Trump, id.has been delayed because of thunderstorms in the District of
Columbia that presented safety concerns for workers. See Ex. A. The removal work is presently
ongoing, and Defendants expect it will conclude in the early hours of the morning of June 13,
2026. Id. Defendants respectfully request a short extension of timeuntil noon on June 13, 2026
to file their compliance declaration. Defendants reached out to Plaintiff when it became clear late
in the evening of June 12 that progress on removal of the letters had been sufficiently hindered to
threaten the midnight compliance deadline.
Plaintiff provided the following position statement:
Plaintiffs position is that Defendants had two weeks to comply with the order, and
only need an extension because of their inexcusable delay. Plaintiff also has
concerns that this fits a patten of non-compliance on Defendants part. But under
the circumstances, Plaintiff takes no position on a 12 hour extension. Plaintiff
would strongly oppose any further extensions.
mopinko
(74,150 posts)11. it's marble. cararra marble. it is fragile.
malaise
(298,938 posts)13. Hiding the removal because it was a bad visual
was the only intent.
Scum is kind.
LuvLoogie
(8,993 posts)3. ...walk into a bar
dpibel
(4,026 posts)4. My apologies
For those late to the thread, this was a good reply to the original subject line of "Two cherry pickers and a scissors lift."
My bad for spoiling a good joke.
ZDU
(1,523 posts)5. Two Cherry-Pickers and a Scissor-Lift..
... walk into a bar and rightfully remove The Donald J. Trump
dgauss
(1,593 posts)9. I will always wonder what the first cherry picker says.
Shellback Squid
(10,204 posts)6. I thought the same thing, designed to be slow
czarjak
(13,739 posts)10. Trumping Kennedy?
Thatll be the day!
malaise
(298,938 posts)12. They should have looked up the curtains idioms
Effin assholes - he still had to remove his name