Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(56,794 posts)
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:15 PM May 20

Chicago Sun-Times Prints AI-Generated Summer Reading List With Books That Don't Exist

Source: 404 Media

The Chicago Sun-Times newspaper’s “Best of Summer” section published over the weekend contains a guide to summer reads that features real authors and fake books that they did not write was partially generated by artificial intelligence, the person who generated it told 404 Media.

The article, called “Summer Reading list for 2025,” suggests reading Tidewater by Isabel Allende, a “multigenerational saga set in a coastal town where magical realism meets environmental activism. Allende’s first climate fiction novel explores how one family confronts rising sea levels while uncovering long-buried secrets.” It also suggests reading The Last Algorithm by Andy Weir, “another science-driven thriller” by the author of The Martian. “This time, the story follows a programmer who discovers that an AI system has developed consciousness—and has been secretly influencing global events for years.” Neither of these books exist, and many of the books on the list either do not exist or were written by other authors than the ones they are attributed to.

The article is not bylined but was written by Marco Buscaglia, whose name is on most of the other articles in the 64-page section. Buscaglia told 404 Media via email and on the phone that the list was AI-generated. “I do use AI for background at times but always check out the material first. This time, I did not and I can't believe I missed it because it's so obvious. No excuses,” he said. “On me 100 percent and I'm completely embarrassed.”

-snip-

Other articles in the Heat Index insert have what appear to be AI-generated sections as well. For example, in an article called “Hanging Out: Inside America’s growing hammock culture,” Buscaglia quotes “Dr. Jennifer Campos, a professor of leisure studies at the University of Colorado, in her 2023 research paper published in the Journal of Contemporary Ethnography.” A search for Campos in the Journal of Contemporary Ethnography does not return any results. While it’s not exactly clear why the AI said this, the only mention of “Jennifer Campos” on the University of Colorado’s website is about the graduation of a student named Jennifer Campos, who works in advertising. The same article also mentions a “2023 Outside Magazine interview” with Brianna Madia, the author of Nowhere for Very Long, a book about van life. “A hammock is basically my most essential piece of furniture,” Buscaglia quotes her as saying. Outside interviewed Madia in 2019, but hammocks were not discussed. Outside also did an article about her favorite van life gear in 2017, and she did not mention hammocks. The quote Buscaglia included does not show up on the internet outside of his own article. There are examples like this throughout the section, and several of them have been pointed out by the journalist Joshua J. Friedman on Bluesky.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.404media.co/chicago-sun-times-prints-ai-generated-summer-reading-list-with-books-that-dont-exist/



More about this, from a followup article 404 Media did:

Viral AI-Generated Summer Guide Printed by Chicago Sun-Times Was Made by Magazine Giant Hearst
https://www.404media.co/viral-ai-generated-summer-guide-printed-by-chicago-sun-times-was-made-by-magazine-giant-hearst/

-snip-

Victor Lim, the vice president of marketing and communications at Chicago Public Media, which owns the Chicago Sun-Times, told 404 Media in a phone call that the Heat Index section was licensed from a company called King Features, which is owned by the magazine giant Hearst. He said that no one at Chicago Public Media reviewed the section and that historically it has not reviewed newspaper inserts that it has bought from King Features.

“Historically, we don’t have editorial review from those mainly because it’s coming from a newspaper publisher, so we falsely made the assumption there would be an editorial process for this,” Lim said. “We are updating our policy to require internal editorial oversight over content like this.”

King Features syndicates comics and columns such as Car Talk, Hints from Heloise, horoscopes, and a column by Dr. Oz to newspapers, but it also makes special inserts that newspapers can buy and put into their papers. King Features calls itself a "unit of Hearst."

Lim said that Chicago Public Media is “reviewing our relationship with Hearst.” He said that the paper has bought several newspaper inserts over the past few years from King Features, which in the past have included things like puzzle books. “It’s a way to supplement our paper, but usually it’s things that are not newsy content. We understand this is unacceptable for us to distribute any false content to our readers.”

-snip-
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

moniss

(7,533 posts)
1. So in addition to being a hack Buscaglia is
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:30 PM
May 20

a liar. He says it was just the one piece he didn't double check and it turns out there were others he obviously didn't.

highplainsdem

(56,794 posts)
2. People who use generative AI tend to start trusting it. Which is very foolish.
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:34 PM
May 20

Foolish to use it, period.

moniss

(7,533 posts)
6. Amen. There are now videos on
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:51 PM
May 20

the Tube that appear to be completely legit but are in fact AI but at least the ones I've seen are labeled as such but the mouth movements and voices of the people pictured are very realistic and the thing that gives it away is the crazy things being said.

Javaman

(64,090 posts)
14. it won't.
Wed May 21, 2025, 07:38 AM
May 21

one day we will wake up and find nothing works and all the electrical power is down. AI will be using it all, but the irony is, we won't be able to get on the net to hear its commanding words.

I still maintain that at some point, artisanal crafting and makers will make a resurgence.

as we further degrade as a nation and we stop importing important things, no big corporations will be created because AI will glom all over them. you will see regional work people creating the things we need.

basically, a 3rd world economy of barter and favor.

Mike 03

(18,488 posts)
5. Holy shit this is funny, but only to a point.
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:40 PM
May 20

The reason I think this is good news is because no writer wants to face this kind of humiliation. So I'm hoping debacles like this encourage authors, reporters, etc. to never, ever accept that AI generated source material is factually accurate.

We need a few more events like this--widely reported--to settle people down about the "miracle" of AI.

Prairie Gates

(5,309 posts)
9. The greatest success of the AI proponents is convincing people to disbelieve their own eyes
Tue May 20, 2025, 05:17 PM
May 20

and judgment.

Anyone who looks at AI generated schlock with an ounce of judgment knows that it is shit. It takes a lot of self-persuading to see it or read it and say, yeah, that's great! Amazing! It's far more amazing when a 5 year old forms a written word than when garbage computer programs create mediocre summaries of Dickens.

RobinA

(10,378 posts)
19. So If I'm About
Wed May 21, 2025, 10:43 AM
May 21

to go to the beach and I want a cache of books to take with me and I pick up some major newspaper's list of notable books for the year, how do I know it's an AI list? Obviously once I start tracking down the books I will not find them, but how the hell do I know what's an AI generated list? I'm to the point where I'm considering dropping all media and just living in my own world. I'm not normally like that, but if I can't tell if something from a reliable source is fake or not, what's the point?

Prairie Gates

(5,309 posts)
7. Embarrassing and sad that talented researchers and writers are losing their jobs
Tue May 20, 2025, 05:11 PM
May 20

to this absurdist promise of fool's gold.

Our entire era will be viewed by historians as the reign of the idiots.

fujiyamasan

(274 posts)
8. Isn't it the job of a journalist...
Tue May 20, 2025, 05:11 PM
May 20

To verify facts? This is like getting a blind tip for a news story annd printing it without getting another source.

I’m not sure how anyone should trust what Buscaglia has to say about anything. While the content of the lies are not as important, it’s the same incompetence that tarnished Stephen glass and the other New York Times writer(s) that made shit up.

RobinA

(10,378 posts)
20. The Thing I Find
Wed May 21, 2025, 10:49 AM
May 21

terrifying is that a reporter writing about books for a major paper didn't KNOW at least some of these books were fakes. I mean, as a reporter, shouldn't a person have some familiarity with what they are writing about? Although I realize that in today's world, actually knowing something is not considered of much importance.

highplainsdem

(56,794 posts)
10. John Scalzi post about this, linking to the Sun-Times' full response to this mess:
Tue May 20, 2025, 06:17 PM
May 20

It should have never happened, but the @chicago.suntimes.com response to this is pretty decent, including owning the fuck-up and working to make sure it doesn't happen again. That said, in 2025 there is no excuse for "advertorial" not being clearly marked.

chicago.suntimes.com/press-room/2...

John Scalzi (@scalzi.com) 2025-05-20T21:10:04.955Z
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chicago Sun-Times Prints ...