DC Bar Overwhelmingly Chooses Veteran Member Over Bondi
Source: Bloomberg Law
DC attorneys rejected Brad Bondis bid to lead the local bar association and instead chose board member Diane Seltzer.
Seltzer received more than 34,000 votes compared to 3,400 for Bondi, the DC Bar said at a Monday press briefing. More than 38,000 voters were cast.
Bondi, a securities lawyer at Paul Hastings whose sister is Attorney General Pam Bondi, drove record turnout as attorneys worried he would interfere with disciplinary proceedings to benefit President Donald Trump. He called such claims politicized cheap shots.
Seltzer, an employment lawyer, has been volunteering for the DC Bar for more than two decades and spent the past five years on the board. She faulted Bondis lack of leadership experience at the organization.
The contentious race for the three-year term was unusual for the professional association of the 120,000 lawyers licensed to practice in Washington.
Read more: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/dc-bar-overwhelmingly-chooses-veteran-member-over-bondi
Link to tweet

LetMyPeopleVote
(166,210 posts)Just in from DC Bar - labor attorney Diane Seltzer defeats securities attorney Brad Bondi in a closely watched race with record turnout.
— Carrie Johnson (@carriejohnson.bsky.social) 2025-06-09T16:10:42.057Z
calimary
(87,030 posts)At least one more Bondi is kept out of a power position. Wish we could have two
IronLionZion
(49,433 posts)

displacedvermoter
(3,867 posts)Made videos endorsing Seltzer
ShazzieB
(21,141 posts)intheflow
(29,619 posts)Thought to look it up at home later, and then here this post pops up! Thanks, and I'm so glad he not only lost but got trounced.
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,210 posts)ancianita
(41,013 posts)dchill
(42,660 posts)iluvtennis
(21,297 posts)bluedigger
(17,268 posts)That's reassuring.
ShazzieB
(21,141 posts)This was an election for the president of a professional association, which a lot of people don't get all that excited about, in my experience. Maybe it's different in some fields, but in the field I was in, those races were never hotly contested, and I don't remember ever being deeply concerned about the outcome.
Another way to look at this is that there's evidently not a large, devoted MAGA contigent on the DC bar, which can only be a good thing!
bluedigger
(17,268 posts)This particular occupation, and this particular locale, I have higher expectations. Still, I take your point - I'm sure many of those members are there only to pad their credentials and keep their fees exorbitant. Not the first time the legal profession has failed to impress me.
onenote
(45,435 posts)Membership in the DC bar is required to practice law in the District of Columbia (as defined in Rule 49 of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Rules), you must be enrolled as an active member of the District of Columbia Bar. See Rule II, Section 4 and Bylaw Article III, Section 3.02.
Ive been a dues paying (currently $348 a year) for nearly 50 years. Never once occurred to me that it was allowing me to charge exorbitant rates for my services.
markbark
(1,611 posts)"I am disgusted by how rabid partisans lurched this election into the political gutter, turning a professional campaign into baseless attacks, identity politics, and partisan recrimination, Bondi said in a statement on Monday. Never before has a DC Bar election been leveraged along partisan lines in this way, an explicit call for members to vote based not on whats best for the institution but according to their political affiliations."
Translation: Partizan hack upset at loss blames partizan hackery
Escurumbele
(3,827 posts)How difficult is it to figure that out? Plain and clear, YOU WERE NOT WHAT IS BEST FOR THE INSTITUTION, that is the real reason you lost, the person who won IS THE BEST FOR THE INSTITUTION.
markbark
(1,611 posts)With the right wingers, every accusation is a confession
patphil
(8,085 posts)BootinUp
(50,073 posts)In the DC bar.