Cannon keeps Jack Smith's classified records report under wraps for now
Source: The Hill
12/22/25 8:47 PM ET
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday lifted restrictions on the release of former special counsel Jack Smiths findings from his investigation into President Trumps handling of classified records but she gave the president a 60-day window to challenge her order.
Cannon did not immediately lift her order barring the Justice Department from sharing the volume of Smiths report reviewing his probe into Trumps alleged record mishandling with four top lawmakers, but she said it would automatically expire on Feb. 24. However, she selected the date in alignment with Trump and his co-defendants request for a minimum 60-day period to seek relief from such an order.
The judge, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, also rejected two nonpartisan watchdog groups bids to compel the release of the report, which covers the Mar-a-Lago investigation. Cannon said the idea that American Oversight and Columbia Universitys Knight First Amendment Institute could intervene in a criminal case because of their Freedom of Information Act interests is unsupported by law and unprecedented in scope.
She also rejected the notion that the report is a judicial record subject to broader public access. Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute, vowed to appeal. This is an extraordinarily significant report about one of the most important criminal investigations in American history, he said in a statement. There is no legitimate reason for the reports continued suppression and the First Amendment requires its release.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5660584-judge-cannon-lifts-report-restrictions/
BOSSHOG
(44,601 posts)And then her slam dunk prosecution could be under wraps in keeping with her judicial philosophy of hard as nails justice. Fucking disgrace but her persona glows Im a Republican.
Chasstev365
(7,014 posts)rampartd
(3,570 posts)then months to get on the docket then more delay. by then cannon will be on the supreme court.
DrFunkenstein
(8,897 posts)It's just a matter of PR for herself and Trump at this point as the Supreme Court knew that the Founders intended for the President to be above the law.
Chasstev365
(7,014 posts)Baitball Blogger
(51,635 posts)in2herbs
(4,158 posts)If so, does the Eleventh Circuit retain the right to review/deny Aileen's 60-day extension because it is not in compliance with their instruction?
BumRushDaShow
(165,152 posts)unless their caveat of "do something" was for her to "rule" on some "next step", which she did (not to release), but then allowing an obscene amount of time (given how long this has been going) for an appeal of that.