Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,152 posts)
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 07:54 AM 21 hrs ago

Cannon keeps Jack Smith's classified records report under wraps for now

Source: The Hill

12/22/25 8:47 PM ET


U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday lifted restrictions on the release of former special counsel Jack Smith’s findings from his investigation into President Trump’s handling of classified records — but she gave the president a 60-day window to challenge her order.

Cannon did not immediately lift her order barring the Justice Department from sharing the volume of Smith’s report reviewing his probe into Trump’s alleged record mishandling with four top lawmakers, but she said it would “automatically expire” on Feb. 24. However, she selected the date in alignment with Trump and his co-defendants’ request for a minimum 60-day period to seek relief from such an order.

The judge, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, also rejected two nonpartisan watchdog groups’ bids to compel the release of the report, which covers the Mar-a-Lago investigation. Cannon said the idea that American Oversight and Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute could intervene in a criminal case because of their Freedom of Information Act interests is “unsupported by law and unprecedented in scope.”

She also rejected the notion that the report is a judicial record subject to broader public access. Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute, vowed to appeal. “This is an extraordinarily significant report about one of the most important criminal investigations in American history,” he said in a statement. “There is no legitimate reason for the report’s continued suppression and the First Amendment requires its release.”

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5660584-judge-cannon-lifts-report-restrictions/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cannon keeps Jack Smith's classified records report under wraps for now (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 21 hrs ago OP
Aileen cannon is a fine candidate for prosecution of judicial misconduct. BOSSHOG 21 hrs ago #1
ABSOLUTELY! Chasstev365 21 hrs ago #4
yes yes trump gets 60 days to appeal rampartd 21 hrs ago #2
Why Does She Care? SCOTUS Gave Blanket Immunity to the King DrFunkenstein 21 hrs ago #3
ENOUGH ALREADY: LEAK THE WHOLE DAMN THING! Chasstev365 21 hrs ago #5
Cannon should get disbarred. Baitball Blogger 20 hrs ago #6
Does this concern Vol II which the Eleventh Circuit gave her until Jan. 3, 2026 to do something about? in2herbs 20 hrs ago #7
I would hope so BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago #8

BOSSHOG

(44,601 posts)
1. Aileen cannon is a fine candidate for prosecution of judicial misconduct.
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 07:58 AM
21 hrs ago

And then her slam dunk prosecution could be under wraps in keeping with her judicial philosophy of hard as nails justice. Fucking disgrace but her persona glows “ I’m a Republican.”

rampartd

(3,570 posts)
2. yes yes trump gets 60 days to appeal
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 07:59 AM
21 hrs ago

then months to get on the docket then more delay. by then cannon will be on the supreme court.

DrFunkenstein

(8,897 posts)
3. Why Does She Care? SCOTUS Gave Blanket Immunity to the King
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 08:09 AM
21 hrs ago

It's just a matter of PR for herself and Trump at this point as the Supreme Court knew that the Founders intended for the President to be above the law.

in2herbs

(4,158 posts)
7. Does this concern Vol II which the Eleventh Circuit gave her until Jan. 3, 2026 to do something about?
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 09:18 AM
20 hrs ago

If so, does the Eleventh Circuit retain the right to review/deny Aileen's 60-day extension because it is not in compliance with their instruction?

BumRushDaShow

(165,152 posts)
8. I would hope so
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 09:26 AM
20 hrs ago

unless their caveat of "do something" was for her to "rule" on some "next step", which she did (not to release), but then allowing an obscene amount of time (given how long this has been going) for an appeal of that.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cannon keeps Jack Smith's...