Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,992 posts)
Tue Feb 24, 2026, 07:11 PM 22 hrs ago

Judge says government may not search devices seized from Post reporter

Source: msn/Washington Post

38m


A federal judge in Virginia rejected the Justice Department’s request to search through a Washington Post reporter’s electronic devices as part of a national security leak investigation, ruling that the court would instead be responsible for conducting the search.

The Tuesday ruling suggested that Magistrate Judge William Porter did not trust the government to conduct a narrow search of the devices and feared that such an examination could risk exposing more than 1,000 of the reporter’s government sources to the Justice Department.

“Given the documented reporting on government leak investigations and the government’s well chronicled efforts to stop them, allowing the government’s filter team to search a reporter’s work product — most of which consists of unrelated information from confidential sources — is the equivalent of leaving the government’s fox in charge of the Washington Post’s henhouse,” Porter wrote.

Porter also sharply criticized prosecutors for not briefing him in their search warrant application on a federal law that protects reporters against searches in many situations: the Privacy Protection Act of 1980. Their failure to inform him about the law before he approved the warrant in the case “has seriously undermined the Court’s confidence in the government’s disclosures in this proceeding,” he wrote.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-says-government-may-not-search-devices-seized-from-post-reporter/ar-AA1X0hUk



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://washingtonpost.com/documents/820e7a03-efb5-4c3c-a02b-d9b5a48ef737.pdf
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge says government may not search devices seized from Post reporter (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago OP
How do we know they haven't been thru the papers by now? Deuxcents 21 hrs ago #1
Trump DOJ sharply rebuked by judge after seizing reporter's devices: 'Fox in the henhouse' LetMyPeopleVote 21 hrs ago #2
The devices were searched within an hour being taken Miguelito Loveless 19 hrs ago #3
That is my thought as well. OldBaldy1701E 19 hrs ago #4
Am I the only one ... SomewhereInTheMiddle 16 hrs ago #5

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,881 posts)
2. Trump DOJ sharply rebuked by judge after seizing reporter's devices: 'Fox in the henhouse'
Tue Feb 24, 2026, 07:47 PM
21 hrs ago

I am glad that the court rejected the search of this reporter's devices

A Virginia federal judge delivered a sharp rebuke to the Justice Department on Tuesday, refusing to let prosecutors search through a Washington Post reporter's seized electronics and taking control of the operation himself.

Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-02-24T23:55:09.449Z

https://www.rawstory.com/washington-post-trump-2675328550

A Virginia federal judge delivered a sharp rebuke to the Justice Department on Tuesday, refusing to let prosecutors search through a Washington Post reporter's seized electronics and taking control of the operation himself.

Magistrate Judge William Porter didn't mince words over the handing over of devices to government investigators.

“Given the documented reporting on government leak investigations and the government’s well chronicled efforts to stop them, allowing the government’s filter team to search a reporter’s work product — most of which consists of unrelated information from confidential sources — is the equivalent of leaving the government’s fox in charge of the Washington Post’s henhouse,” Porter wrote, according to The Washington Post.

The judge feared Trump's Justice Department couldn't be trusted to conduct a narrow search without exposing more than 1,000 of reporter Hannah Natanson's confidential sources.

The decision represented a major victory for the newspaper and Natanson after federal agents conducted an unprecedented January raid on her Virginia home, seizing phones, laptops, a recorder, hard drive, and even a Garmin watch. Law enforcement claimed the search targeted a government contractor suspected of leaking classified information.

OldBaldy1701E

(10,848 posts)
4. That is my thought as well.
Tue Feb 24, 2026, 10:22 PM
19 hrs ago

Now, we wait to see if they act on any of that information.

Because if certain employees within the government are suddenly fired, or mistreated in any way, we will know for sure that they did so.

Which would normally mean some serious jail time. But, since that is no longer a thing in the US for anyone above a certain wealth level, we know that won't be happening.

5. Am I the only one ...
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 01:32 AM
16 hrs ago

... that saw "Fox in the henhouse" and immediately thought it was referring to the "news" station?

I guess I have so traumatized by Fox's presence in the RW circle of madness that I immediately leap to blame them.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge says government may...