Democratic moderates warn that leaning too far left in midterms sets up presidential loss in 2028

[Omaha Steve]

Source: AP

By MEG KINNARD
Updated 4:27 PM CST, March 2, 2026

CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Across the country, progressives are lighting a fire that they hope will catapult Democrats back to power in Congress this year. But here in a hotel ballroom, the party’s beleaguered moderates have another message — not so fast.

Leaders at Third Way’s conference talked over and over about how Democrats can’t swing too far left in the midterms, or when picking their next presidential nominee, if they have any hope of winning back the White House.

The title of the two-day, invite-only conference: “Winning the Middle.” And there was plenty of advice on how to do that.

Be plainspoken, not lofty or academic. Don’t live online, but be authentic on social media. Loosen up, and be patriotic without fear that something like the American flag or Pledge of Allegiance has been co-opted by conservatives.



Read more: https://apnews.com/article/2026-2028-election-progressive-moderate-0a8db97aff5e49c22625c2f0d7036fcf

[Bread and Circuses]

1. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Way Too Late. We're cleaning house with great democrats !

[msongs]

2. $15 an hr min wage and affordable health care for all...oh no nt

[gab13by13]

3. Pitting Moderates v Progressives is what brings us down

How about we nominate fighters?

[creon]

14. I agree

WQe do not need a blue on blue.

The emeny is that way son ----->

There is plenty of ammunitrion for firing for effect at the enmy

[Safe as Milk]

4. We've been here before.

Moderate Dems are corporatists in Teslas. IMO. Not interested.

[creeksneakers2]

22. We've lost before because progressives wouldn't help

And ended up with terrible consequences.

[Fiendish Thingy]

5. There is no middle between Democracy and Fascism

Centrism is an imaginary, performative construct for politicians without spines or values.

[creon]

17. First things first

First you gain offoce.

The mooto must be

"up men! and at 'em! They won't stand!

The, in office, you devise legislation that actually solve problems.

And put away labels.

Remember that social security was first passed was minimal.

[choie]

6. Third Way??are you serious?

Why the fuck should we listen to these neo liberal, keep things the way they are, m diocrities?

[johnnyplankton]

7. Fuck the Third Way

We lose because we won't deliver on "radical" ideas like universal healthcare. That and a completely corrupted corporate media.

[creeksneakers2]

23. Nope

We lost our majorities in Congress after trying to pass Hillary care. And after Obamacare we lost 63 seats in the House and 7 seat in the Senate. They tried to pass single payer health care in liberal Oregon in 2002. It lost 78.5% to 21.5%. What we got took great sacrifice and its a terrible idea to squander it on pipedreams. Please help out with trying to stop Fascism. It would be a big victory if we could get back what we had a year ago.

[NH Ethylene]

30. Better to seek to restore funding for Obamacare.

Many moderates can support that while balking at anything more. One step at a time. We need to get back into power and then go slowly with healthcare improvements.

[Deuxcents]

8. We've been muzzled too long. The sure way to a loss is not taking a stand against these middle of the road ideas

[creeksneakers2]

25. That idea will get us beat again.

Most voters are not radical.

[Deuxcents]

31. Our forefathers were radical. Is wanting our kids healthy

With a quality education, affordable wages, housing, healthcare, clean air n water and an economy that’s fair for everyone radical? Is fixing our aging infrastructure radical? Is having a platform for the betterment of future generations radical? Making promises that are impossible to keep to stay in the middle of the road is not a winning strategy. Jmo 🌺

[creeksneakers2]

33. Those things are fine

If you want to push single payer, defund the police etc we'll lose. What do you mean by fair for everyone? If its socialism it won't fly.

[LovelyStuff]

9. Third Way?

These guys are still back in the 1990s!

[NewHendoLib]

10. I fucking hate this moderate bullshit. Cowards, one and all.

[Prairie Gates]

11. This is an opinion piece masquerading as a news article

What's the news here? Some people have an opinion?

Garbage.

[Marie Marie]

12. Oh here we go again...

[Skittles]

13. WHY is it only Dems who have to "mitigate"

you NEVER see repukes getting these "warnings"

[creeksneakers2]

26. They'll lose because they are extreme.

[NH Ethylene]

32. But they didn't lose last time.

They play dirty and use scare tactics and hot-button social issues.

We need to start off more moderate to WIN. And then lead public opinion - over time - to the point where they support the stances that are now considered to be far left.

[creeksneakers2]

35. They hid who they were last time.

They were about halting a flood of illegal immigration, not unleashing gangs of thugs into our cities. I agree that after we stop Fascism we can have a debate about the next step. But first we have to restore what has been destroyed. Then, if we can afford it, look at doing more.

[Nictuku]

15. Fuck the Third Way

That is All.

[Oneironaut]

16. And, don't forget to let your inner-bigot shine! Trash Minorities, proclaim your love of Christian Nationalism, and,

scold the "Far-Left" for being big meanies to Trump.

Or, we could have a spine?

[NH Ethylene]

34. Not necessary.

Show the people what honor is, what patriotism is, what compassion is. They need to be wooed, not yanked.

[moonshinegnomie]

18. the right had their tea party around 2010

the dems need their version now to replace th o ld guard with young fighters ready to get in th egutter and fight the fascists instead of sending strongly worded notes .

[creeksneakers2]

27. What should we do?

We are fighting. Its damn hard.

[3Hotdogs]

19. What? Ya don't like the job Chuckie Schumer is doing?

[Terry_M]

20. Terrible arricle headline

The headline says dont go left but if you read the article content the advice is spot on - be more plain, talk more simply, dont just assume trolling Trump is gonna win you elections. Actually come up with an economic message that the common person will understand. Those things are all important and correct.

[C Moon]

21. I can see that being true, because we've seen it time and time again...

the public forgets WAY to quickly.

When the Democratic party gains control again, they need to start charging and seeing those who are now breaking our laws are sentenced and pay for their crimes. No more let's heal and move on. It doesn't work with the gop.

[SSJVegeta]

24. I think we should listen to them

Because every time Democrats listen to moderates, it always works out well for them.

[creeksneakers2]

28. Yes

Like with Bill Clinton.

[Buzz cook]

37. Clinton was my favorite but

Lots of where he failed was because he listened to moderates.
NAFTA was an attempt to appease moderate republicans and conservative democrats.
Ending Glass Steagall was a gift to moderates.
But worst was media consolidation. We may never recover from that.

[creeksneakers2]

38. But he held off the conservatives for eight years.

[pecosbob]

29. So what you want is more Democrats that will vote both for war and for tax cuts for the rich? I think not

[NH Ethylene]

36. Those came with the Trump package.

People don't necessarily approve of them (in fact I've seen some hard-line Trumpers grow cool to Trump in the last couple of days over the Iran war). And remember Luigi Mangione? Right after he killed the insurance CEO, everybody was cheering him (while saying murder was wrong, of course, but . . . ) However, the minute Trump condemned the killing, the MAGAs switched their sentiments in true, follow-the-leader fashion. With the right kind of presentation, taxing the rich could become a popular Democratic stance that would not alienate anyone as being too far left. Similarly, stop the war in the Middle East may very well be quite a popular message by November.

[usonian]

39. Theoretical bullshit. Let's get some real data.

Long story short. Bernie and AOC are generating enough excitement to break through the propaganda wall.

Only a REVOLUTIONARY Democratic party will win, because the maga servants of the rich think they are part of a revolution.
Against an Emmanuel Goldstein kind of enemy who exists in Fox Fiction.

A grassroots revolution is needed for the party to win.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/13244015

The Democratic Party needs to be REVOLUTIONARY, not reactionary. That is how we win. PERIOD.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=420478