This DHS Official Oversees the Security of Federal Elections. He Wants to Ban Voting Machines.
Source: ProPublica
David Harvilicz, who co-founded a firm with a 2020 election denier, oversees voting machine security for the Department of Homeland Security while the Trump administration is relitigating the president's baseless claims that the 2020 vote was stolen.
In his top post at the Department of Homeland Security, David Harvilicz sets policy on protecting the nation's elections infrastructure, including voting machines.
He's also the co-founder of a company with James Penrose, who helped hatch debunked conspiracy theories blaming hacked voting machines for Donald Trump's loss in the 2020 presidential election. Penrose assisted in a push to seize voting machines to overturn Trump's defeat.
On social media, Harvilicz has called for doing away with voting machines, saying they are "eminently vulnerable to exploitation." In a March post, he wrote that "DHS needs to ban voting machines for all federal elections. The time is now." He also has repeatedly questioned the validity of Democratic electoral victories and pushed for Republicans to overhaul electoral systems to their advantage.
Read more: https://www.propublica.org/article/david-harvilicz-homeland-security-voting-machines
erronis
(23,638 posts)He's also the co-founder of a company with James Penrose, who helped hatch debunked conspiracy theories blaming hacked voting machines for Donald Trump's loss in the 2020 presidential election. Penrose assisted in a push to seize voting machines to overturn Trump's defeat.
On social media, Harvilicz has called for doing away with voting machines, saying they are "eminently vulnerable to exploitation." In a March post, he wrote that "DHS needs to ban voting machines for all federal elections. The time is now." He also has repeatedly questioned the validity of Democratic electoral victories and pushed for Republicans to overhaul electoral systems to their advantage.
. . .
Penrose, a former intelligence officer, played a leading role in the campaign to help Trump in his failed bid to overturn the 2020 election, ProPublica has reported. Penrose also participated in multiple attempts to clandestinely seize voting machines, including in Michigan, where prosecutors accused him of breaking into some of the machines. (Penrose wasn't charged in the case.) He appeared to be an unindicted co-conspirator in the failed Georgia prosecution in which Trump was accused of conspiring to overturn the election results, according to The Washington Post.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,960 posts)bluestarone
(22,047 posts)States decide their own laws, so what if say half the states, (rethug states of course) decide to do just what TSF boys want to do, Then what would happen?
Fiendish Thingy
(22,960 posts)But they cant cancel the elections in their states- the federal ones are mandated by the constitution, and the state ones by law or the state constitution.
Any laws or regulations they do pass are subject to challenge in court.
If the red states make it too hard to vote, they will disenfranchise more of their voters than ours- thats why they dont want to pass the SAVE act.
GreenWave
(12,598 posts)10 years max. We must count the years when the GOP obeyed his every insanity.
RussBLib
(10,584 posts)
trained monkeys? MAGA loyalists?
GTFOH
erronis
(23,638 posts)bluestarone
(22,047 posts)paleotn
(22,125 posts)paleotn
(22,125 posts)That's state legislatures. Constitutionally, only Congress can intervene nationally, not the Executive Branch. Other than what's prescribed constitutionally or by congressional act, it's states who make these decisions. NOT DHS. If what the author states is really a problem right now, then why the SAVE Act? It would be irrelevant. If the author wants something to worry about, then perhaps the SAVE Act is a better target. Interestingly, they don't even mention it. Weird.
Is it just me or is reporting on the left getting really, really sloppy. We're getting the same fear mongering BS so prevalent on the right.
https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/states-not-president-run-elections-america
https://www.ncsl.org/state-legislatures-news/details/the-states-decide-how-elections-are-run
somaticexperiencing
(593 posts)orleans
(36,857 posts)orleans
(36,857 posts)votes were flipped in republican's favor and we wanted paper ballots where votes could have a hand recount.
i don't get what all the dust up is about oh republicans now want to ban voting machines. i haven't voted on one of those fucking things in YEARS.
doesn't anyone remember diebold? undervotes? ES&S? those mysterious "patches"?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10022560634
Figarosmom
(11,570 posts)Figarosmom
(11,570 posts)Booths were good and easy and as far as I know we're not a problem. Then Bush passed the "Help America Vote Act" which brought in all the different electronic machines. They are a REPUBLICAN idea to begin with. So we said okay and used them knowing they were not all that secure with proprietary code that only the companies knew. And the companies owned by repubs.We still won with Obama twice. But then repubs got the majority so they added IDs to vote. We got the damn IDs and when Biden won all of a sudden THAT'S not good enough either.
So now they want more IDs, hate to tell them but if they pass SAVE our side will be more able to get the added docs or already have them, not yours.