Trump appointee Ed Martin claims executive privilege in bid to evade misconduct charges

[LetMyPeopleVote]

Source: Democracy Docket

Ed Martin, the hardline MAGA Republican serving as President Donald Trump’s pardon attorney, is attempting to claim executive privilege in a bid to evade misconduct charges from attorney ethics regulators in Washington, D.C.

In a wild new legal filing this week, Martin lashed out against the D.C. Disciplinary Counsel, which polices attorney misconduct in the nation’s capital, alleging that its ongoing ethics case against him violates Trump’s authority.

Martin’s astounding arguments appear to claim that the president and federal attorneys are indistinguishable and that any attempt to hold Department of Justice (DOJ) officials accountable for misconduct amounts to an unconstitutional attack on the president’s authority.....

Among them, Martin said he would argue in federal court that the Disciplinary Counsel’s probe violates Article II of the Constitution because the president and federal attorneys are, in essence, synonymous.

“The President’s exercise of his authorities under the Take Care Clause through his U.S. Attorneys cannot be interfered with or hobbled by harassing and pretextual enforcement actions,” Martin argued.

“The President of the United States is the client of all attorneys appointed pursuant to the President’s Article II authority, and every executive branch attorney is bound by the President’s decisions concerning the objectives of the representation defined by their respective appointments,” he continued.

Read more: https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-ed-martin-washington-dc-misconduct-charges-defense/

---

Trump appointee Ed Martin claims executive privilege in bid to evade misconduct charges www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...

— Ray Beckerman (@raybeckerman.bsky.social) 2026-04-08T21:06:48.212Z

[LetMyPeopleVote]

1. Deadline Legal Blog-MAGA enforcer Ed Martin wants his DC Bar disciplinary case moved to federal court

The Trump-aligned lawyer is attempting a litigation tactic that previously failed another Trump-aligned lawyer.
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/ed-martin-dc-bar-federal-court

President Donald Trump’s failed U.S. attorney nominee-turned-pardon attorney Ed Martin is trying to move his DC Bar disciplinary proceedings to federal court. It’s a move that another Trump-aligned lawyer, Jeffrey Clark, previously tried and failed. ....

The bar initiated formal disciplinary proceedings. In a filing specifying the charges last month, bar disciplinary counsel Hamilton Fox alleged Martin “knew or should have known that, as a government official, his conduct violated the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.”

Fox also accused Martin of misconduct in response to the bar’s investigation by engaging in unauthorized direct communication with a judge during a proceeding and engaging in conduct that seriously interfered with the administration of justice.....

On Tuesday, he filed a notice in D.C. federal court, arguing that’s the forum in which the proceedings should move forward. In his federal filing, Martin cast the matter as stemming from his investigation of Fox and from Fox then retaliating by investigating Martin in turn.

“The case is being removed to this Court because Mr. Martin is entitled to a federal forum for the adjudication of his federal defenses,” his lawyers wrote in Tuesday’s federal court filing. In addition to his legal argument, the 98-page document contains exhibits of relevant letters and filings, including his correspondence with Georgetown and judges.

The bar will have an opportunity to respond in federal court. One of the cases it might cite in opposition to Martin’s removal bid is Clark’s failed effort. During the first Trump term, the former assistant attorney general sought to remove his bar proceedings that stemmed from his alleged conduct in the wake of the 2020 election.

Rejecting Clark’s federal removal bid in a 2023 ruling, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras wrote that Congress “has committed the regulation of federal government attorneys to the states and courts where they practice.” The Obama-appointee cited the Supreme Court’s observation of the tradition, “since the founding of the Republic,” that “the licensing and regulation of lawyers has been left exclusively to the States and the District of Columbia within their respective jurisdictions.”

A bipartisan federal appellate panel affirmed Clark’s removal rejection, focusing on procedural issues specific to his case. In any event, the logic underpinning the district judge’s ruling against Clark could lead to the same result against Martin. Even if Martin loses his removal attempt, that would not mean he would necessarily face any bar discipline in the end, only that the matter would not proceed in his chosen forum.

Ed Martin and Jeffrey Clark are both assholes. Clark's disbarment was recommended by the DC Bar and is being considered by the Court of Appeals. The same needs to happen to Ed Martin

[Dave Bowman]

2. Another crook bites the dust.

[badhair77]

3. He's as slimy as they come.

I will enjoy watching him suffer.

[bluestarone]

4. Nothing like admiting

Hey i'm guilty so i'm gonna claim executive privilege. My God these type people have no conscience at all. They are all so EVIL!!