Meta Is Warned That Facial Recognition Glasses Will Arm Sexual Predators
Source: Wired
More than 70 civil liberties, domestic violence, reproductive rights, LGBTQ+, labor, and immigrant advocacy organizations are demanding that Meta abandon plans to deploy face recognition on its Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses, warning that the featurereportedly known inside the company as Name Tagwould hand stalkers, abusers, and federal agents the ability to silently identify strangers in public.
The coalition, which includes the ACLU, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Fight for the Future, Access Now, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, is demanding Meta kill the feature before launch, after internal documents surfaced showing the company hoped to use the current dynamic political environment as cover for the rollout, betting that civil society groups would have their resources focused on other concerns.
Name Tag, as revealed in February by The New York Times, would work through the artificial intelligence assistant built into Meta's smart glasses, allowing wearers to pull up information about people in their field of view. Engineers have reportedly been weighing two versions of the feature: one that would only identify people the wearer is already connected to on a Meta platform, and a broader version that could recognize anyone with a public account on a Meta service such as Instagram.
The coalition wants Meta to scrap the feature entirely. In a letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Monday, it argues that face recognition in inconspicuous consumer eyewear cannot be resolved through product design changes, opt-out mechanisms, or incremental safeguards. Bystanders in public have no meaningful way to consent to being identified, it says.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.wired.com/story/meta-ray-ban-oakley-smart-glasses-no-face-recognition-civil-society/
RockRaven
(19,503 posts)Zuck is a sick fuck, will do anything for a buck. And then lie about it.
If he can make money off of predators, he will, knowingly and purposely. And as noted in that article, will do so strategically not incidentally.
unblock
(56,216 posts)GenThePerservering
(3,469 posts)Curious sequence, that.
paleotn
(22,374 posts)JI7
(93,698 posts)paleotn
(22,374 posts)paleotn
(22,374 posts)Perhaps a bunch of pasty tech bros who need some sunlight, normal human interactions, and an education beyond the confines of the Computer Science department.
rubbersole
(11,239 posts)This is a horrible aspect of a Big Brother bad idea from the jump. Facial recognition is a privacy killer and will be abused even if only allowed to be legally used by "law enforcement".
CousinIT
(12,583 posts)3825-87867
(1,970 posts)ID the agents?
Just a thought!
FakeNoose
(41,864 posts)Facebook can archive the data so we'll have solid proof who attacked us, as well as when and where it happened. A lot more white men will be going to prison soon.
dickthegrouch
(4,559 posts)Until I sign an agreement explicitly giving that permission, fb does not have my permission to identify me, ever!
Attorneys, please take note.