Trump: 'Prepared' to nominate new Supreme Court justice if Alito, Thomas retire
Source: The Hill
04/15/26 8:51 AM ET
President Trump said he is prepared to name another justice to the Supreme Court if one of the older members retires. No justice has suggested that they would be stepping down from their lifetime appointments, but there has been speculation surrounding Justice Samuel Alito, 76, who was hospitalized in March.
It could be two, could be three, could be one. I dont know Im prepared to do it, he told Fox Business Maria Bartiromo in an interview that aired Wednesday. Trump praised Justice Alito, calling him one of the great justices of all time. Justice Alito is an unbelievable justice and a brilliant justice and he gets the country, Trump said. He does whats right for the country.
Justice Clarence Thomas, 77, is another conservative justice to watch, though there has been less speculation about his retirement. Trump said he has a shortlist of people he would nominate to the Supreme Court but added that he was not sure there would be an opening by the end of the year. The president has reportedly been interested in naming Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to the court.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters Tuesday that the GOP would be prepared to confirm a Supreme Court vacancy if one opened before the midterms, according to Politico. It would be ideal for the administration to get its Supreme Court pick in before the midterms while Republicans still maintain the Senate.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5831975-trump-prepared-name-supreme-justice/
Absolutely no comment but this was expected and Harris/Walz warned and warned but a whole lot didn't listen or care.
CousinIT
(12,592 posts)BumRushDaShow
(170,479 posts)He is generally "anti-woman". He'll use them as they grovel at his feet to "entertain" him and do his bidding (like Stefanik, Bondi, Noem, and Gabbard) and then will discard them, throwing them under the bus quickly.
walkingman
(10,965 posts)bluestarone
(22,270 posts)They are worried about losing the Senate!! Maybe, just maybe we can increase to 13 after midterms? Really hope so!!
Blues Heron
(8,885 posts)walkingman
(10,965 posts)marble falls
(71,993 posts)... for Barrack Obama, it's good enough for the sack of pig shit currently in the White House.
https://www.npr.org/2016/03/16/470664561/mcconnell-blocking-supreme-court-nomination-about-a-principle-not-a-person
-snip-
"I believe the overwhelming view of the Republican Conference in the Senate is that this nomination should not be filled, this vacancy should not be filled by this lame duck president," McConnell said.
-snip-
BumRushDaShow
(170,479 posts)That only works when THEY control the Senate. And since they DO, we are SOL.
marble falls
(71,993 posts)... particularly since SCOTUS overwhelmingly votes against TACO with with Kavanaugh and Barret voting against TACO.
He has to do this soon, the Senate may well change hands in Nov.
BumRushDaShow
(170,479 posts)and will give Alito (and Thomas if he doesn't choose to "die on the bench" instead, since he is that onery and stubborn) pardons for all their crimes. Easy peasy unlimited power.
rampartd
(4,727 posts)Bayard
(29,896 posts)Who doesn't seem to care much about upholding the Constitution. Not ONE more!
BumRushDaShow
(170,479 posts)GOPers wanting his arrogant and smarmy ass out of the Senate and 45 giving a nod to the Cuban communities that supported him (Sotomayor is Puerto Rican).
Scrivener7
(59,740 posts)And if this all happens after next November and we win the Senate, the Democratic Senators better block his nominees for the next two years.
Also, we just found out Swalwell's actions have been an open secret for years. You can't convince me there aren't a dozen republican Senators in the same position. Now would be a good time to twist some of their arms to vote with Democrats on this, Michael Corleone style. Pooh pooh the idea if you want, but since the alternative would be the demolition of the Supreme Court for a generation, we need to not be dainty in our sensibilities about this.
kimbutgar
(27,331 posts)Johonny
(26,318 posts)In most of our lifetimes. Electing a criminal moron that doesn't believe in our country's founding principles is a disgrace. Fuck every one of his voters. They have no excuse. Terrible people.
SSJVegeta
(2,886 posts)BumRushDaShow
(170,479 posts)as it's just a simple majority for confirmation and recall how quick Comey-Barrett was nominated and confirmed (in a month).
That was done a week before the election when Democrats actually took back seats in the Senate and brought it to a "tie" (where we finally took control of the Committees due to having a (D) VP when Biden was elected, making her a "tie breaker" for votes),
October 26, 2020 8:07 PM ET
(snip)
While Senate Democrats tried to slow down the confirmation process of Trump's third Supreme Court nominee with various procedural maneuvers, the fact that Republicans control the Senate has always meant a Barrett confirmation was all but promised.
And it's bad enough that he has 2 more years in office. That's why the WARNING, which was ignored by selfish-ass people across the spectrum.
SSJVegeta
(2,886 posts)Impeach the newly appointed justices or add seats to the supreme court.
...or just impeach the prez and vp then make Jeffries president.
Or all of the above?
Easy peasy
BumRushDaShow
(170,479 posts)Although there aren't enough Senate seats up to do that much of a pickup with us needing to win 9 (R) seats for that scenario (and only ~1/3rd of the Senate is up each election cycle, with some who are obviously our own seats that we are defending).
SSJVegeta
(2,886 posts)Still we would need to win all but 2 or 3 of all the Senate seats up for election
BumRushDaShow
(170,479 posts)Here is the breakdown - https://www.270towin.com/news/2025/01/03/introducing-2026-senate-interactive-map_1688.html

We are hoping to get 4 "competitive" (R) seats (ME, NC, IA, OH). There are 2 others that could add on (MT & AK).
We have 13 of the 33 that are (D)s.
I know some keep staring at TX but I don't think that is happening. Too much heartbreak after O'Rourke and Allred losses.
Omnipresent
(7,474 posts)As long as its on a high road.
jgmiller
(695 posts)I mean with this circus yes of course there could be worse picks but in the end if either of those two retired the replacement would just be rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. The only reason Trump keeps floating this is because he wants to be able to say he appointed 5 or more judges to the court. If he gets both of them to retire at once then he's got his 5. The thing is both of those guys think they are the only thing standing in the way everyone in the US being required to change gender or some other MAGA fever dream.
Dave Bowman
(7,285 posts)intheflow
(30,201 posts)
Bayard
(29,896 posts)Horses are forgiving and intelligent, and could care less about politics. Carrots on the other hand......
dutch777
(5,086 posts)cab67
(3,794 posts)They'll try to ram it through before then.
WestMichRad
(3,304 posts)cab67
(3,794 posts)radicalleft
(577 posts)Who has already appointed three could potentially appoint 2 more...5 nutjob justices by a reality show rapist pedophile.
Solly Mack
(97,031 posts)mdbl
(8,717 posts)Sounds like trivial propaganda to me.
ToxMarz
(2,976 posts)eringer
(536 posts)You can sure buy him out of his seat. Just get one of your crooked billionaires to sell him 5 percent of a professional sports team with no money down and then buy it back for $60 million after he puts his paperwork in. It worked for George W. Bush when he needed money to steal the Presudency.