Trump jawboned Thune to fire Senate's top rules referee over ballroom ruling: report
Source: Raw Story
May 18, 2026 9:01PM ET
President Donald Trump privately demanded that Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) fire Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough.
According to NOTUS, "President Donald Trump pressed Senate Majority Leader John Thune to fire the Senate parliamentarian after she ruled Republicans could not include funding for the presidents ballroom in a budget bill, two sources familiar with the request told NOTUS." However, Thune is adamantly refusing to get rid of MacDonough, who was first appointed as the Senate rules referee in 2012 and has often frustrated majorities in both parties.
The bill, which is primarily intended to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the entirety of Trump's remaining term, first included $1 billion in funding for strictly "security"-related features of the ballroom, which Trump for months has maintained would be financed solely through donor contributions.
Senate Republicans, who have previously expressed discomfort with the ballroom provision, are now moving to rewrite and scale it back in a way they hope will pass muster with the parliamentarian.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-ballroom-2676911107/
Link to NOTUS article - Trump Is Pressuring John Thune to Fire the Parliamentarian Over Ballroom Funding
rampartd
(5,037 posts)or the position renamed to something more patriotic
riversedge
(81,539 posts)dave99
(270 posts)So Thune should up his personal bodyguard number
the nelm
(296 posts)I mean, seriously, having to repeatedly listen and take Trump's bs must be exhausting and downright annoying...
Raven123
(7,896 posts)The ballroom is unpopular. Thune can just pretend he is not playing politics by protecting the Parlamentarian.
MarcoZandrini
(211 posts)turn that part of White House grounds into a chip and putt.
MadameButterfly
(4,156 posts)They ignore any law they please but are bound by this? Habeus Corpus is optional, they just allowed a war in Iran and a 1.8 bilion dollar bribe for Trump's brownshirts, but they can't stop the parlementarian? I don't understand.
melm00se
(5,173 posts)(and, to be honest, the filibuster) is that Republicans know that they will need this role in the future and if Republicans remove this person (or role), it will come to quite firmly bite them on the ass.
It is a self serving action.
Historic NY
(40,135 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.