Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm referencing a post on discrepancies in 2024 election, and we need to do better ensuring acurate mid-term results (Original Post) NowsTheTime Jun 2025 OP
A bit more. usonian Jun 2025 #1
Here is a link to the lawsuit... ultralite001 Jun 2025 #2

usonian

(26,589 posts)
1. A bit more.
Thu Jun 12, 2025, 02:23 PM
Jun 2025

In addition to the economictimes article (quote below), LymphocyteLover posted this link, to essentially the same article:
https://dailyboulder.com/report-voting-machines-were-altered-before-the-2024-election-did-kamala-harris-actually-win/

quote from the first:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/kamala-harris-won-the-u-s-elections-bombshell-report-claims-voting-machines-were-tampered-with-before-2024/articleshow/121732679.cms


According to the investigative piece from Daily Boulder, a private lab quietly implemented sweeping changes to voting machines used in over 40% of U.S. counties ahead of the 2024 race. Those changes, the report claims, were made with no public notice, no formal testing, and no third-party oversight.


What changes were made to voting machines before the 2024 election?
The report centers around Pro V&V, a federally accredited lab responsible for certifying voting machines in key states like Pennsylvania, Florida, New Jersey, and California. In early 2024, the lab reportedly approved updates to ES&S voting systems, which included:

* New ballot scanners

* Printer reconfigurations

* Firmware upgrades

* A new Electionware reporting system


Instead of labeling these as major changes, Pro V&V classified them as “de minimis,” a term typically reserved for insignificant tweaks. This classification allowed them to bypass public scrutiny and avoid triggering full-scale testing or certification processes.

ultralite001

(2,673 posts)
2. Here is a link to the lawsuit...
Thu Jun 12, 2025, 02:48 PM
Jun 2025
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=5E1/Fc_PLUS_rWASPlhLKP7dKOQ==

Here's more from SMART Elections:

https://smartelections.us/home

Information about "algorithms" + rigging the vote... from Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, 2:20-cv-01771...
w/ info about Pro V & V...

https://ia801709.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.wied.92717/gov.uscourts.wied.92717.1.21.pdf

Additional details are also noted here:

https://dissentinbloom.substack.com/p/the-machines-were-changed-before

It's helpful to have all this information in one place. Thanks...

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»The Way Forward»I'm referencing a post on...