Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MASSIVE BREAKING: Judge strikes down Trump's $15 Billion lawsuit against the New York Times. [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(170,058 posts)14. Judge strikes down Trump's $15 billion suit against the New York Times
Calling it decidedly improper and impermissible, Judge Steven D. Merryday lambasted the 85-page complaint and said it could not stand.
Judge strikes down Trumpâs billion suit against the New York Times
— JJ's Bucket Hat (not Rodney) (@mrtriskaideka.bsky.social) 2025-09-19T16:30:10.810Z
www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/09/19/judge-strikes-down-trumps-15-billion-suit-against-new-york-times/
A federal judge in Tampa struck down President Donald Trumps defamation lawsuit against the New York Times, saying that the 85-page complaint was decidedly improper and impermissible under the rules governing civil proceedings in federal court.
U.S. District Judge Steven D. Merryday, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, issued a scathing ruling on Friday, lambasting the president and his lawyers for their complaint.
In this action, a prominent American citizen (perhaps the most prominent American citizen) alleges defamation by a prominent American newspaper publisher (perhaps the most prominent American newspaper publisher) and by several other corporate and natural persons, he wrote. Alleging only two simple counts of defamation, the complaint consumes eighty-five pages. Count I appears on page eighty, and Count II appears on page eighty-three....
In addition to the legal issues at hand, Merryday bemoaned the writing.
The reader of the complaint must labor through allegations, such as a new journalistic low for the hopelessly compromised and tarnished Gray Lady.' The reader must endure an allegation of the desperate need to defame with a partisan spear rather than report with an authentic looking glass and an allegation that the false narrative about The Apprentice was just the tip of Defendants melting iceberg of falsehoods.
The judge said every lawyer should know that a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective and not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers Corner.
U.S. District Judge Steven D. Merryday, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, issued a scathing ruling on Friday, lambasting the president and his lawyers for their complaint.
In this action, a prominent American citizen (perhaps the most prominent American citizen) alleges defamation by a prominent American newspaper publisher (perhaps the most prominent American newspaper publisher) and by several other corporate and natural persons, he wrote. Alleging only two simple counts of defamation, the complaint consumes eighty-five pages. Count I appears on page eighty, and Count II appears on page eighty-three....
In addition to the legal issues at hand, Merryday bemoaned the writing.
The reader of the complaint must labor through allegations, such as a new journalistic low for the hopelessly compromised and tarnished Gray Lady.' The reader must endure an allegation of the desperate need to defame with a partisan spear rather than report with an authentic looking glass and an allegation that the false narrative about The Apprentice was just the tip of Defendants melting iceberg of falsehoods.
The judge said every lawyer should know that a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective and not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers Corner.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

MASSIVE BREAKING: Judge strikes down Trump's $15 Billion lawsuit against the New York Times. [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Friday
OP
A federal judge just sumamrily struck Trump's complaint against the New York Times, calling it, essentially, garbage.
LetMyPeopleVote
Friday
#1
Yeah, but all he really did was tell them to shorten it. They can refile within 30 days. nt
pnwmom
Friday
#18
I was disappointed because the title made me think the decision was on substantive grounds.
pnwmom
Friday
#61
Yep - I know. My intention was that he was hoping for another judge who had her sense of the law...and loyalty.
CincyDem
Friday
#17
Or Perhaps, an Actual Qualified Graduate of a Law School, Versus Witless Cowpie Canon
The Roux Comes First
Friday
#29
He filed in the same court he had to file in last time. It's a matter of correct jurisdiction, not judge shopping.
ancianita
Friday
#33
I don't know, all the more puzzling that he filed it in the same middle district he filed against the NYT last year.
ancianita
Friday
#51
He won't appeal. He'll refile a 40 page complaint in place of his 85 page complaint
onenote
Friday
#31
I would love to see trump appeal this ruling but it is more likely that he will refile
LetMyPeopleVote
Friday
#43
Predictable. When trump appeals he'll get the same SCOTUS ruling he got in his 2024 suit.
ancianita
Friday
#24
He'll appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, lose there, then to SCOTUS. Wasting valuable court time losing
ancianita
Friday
#36
trump was never going to be deposed in this case and so he may well appeal
LetMyPeopleVote
Friday
#45
Exactly. All the more reason to see his pattern and slap a fine on him for filing a SLAPP suit.
ancianita
Friday
#50
I expect that the defendants will invoke the NY Anti-Slapp suit law against Trump.
onenote
Friday
#40
Twas a stupid lawsuit without merit. DonOLD Rump should be fined $97523689532.99 for filing it !!!!!!
Trueblue1968
Friday
#34
There was no fighting back. The judge ruled on his own motion. And its just a temporary ruling.
onenote
Friday
#37
"When we get to pleading in my first-year Civil Procedure class, my students often ask me ..."
mahatmakanejeeves
Friday
#44
MaddowBlog-Judge rejects Trump's case against The New York Times, tells lawyers to rewrite it
LetMyPeopleVote
Friday
#48