Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Fiendish Thingy

(20,936 posts)

4. Isn't there a pending SCOTUS case challenging the power of the executive branch to regulate?

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sun Sep 28, 2025, 08:14 PM

Sep 28

My understanding is the case claims only Congress can regulate business etc, and seeks to require legislation for each specific regulation, rather than delegating the authority to the executive branch.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

progressoid

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's new executive order could dramatically change your retirement account -- why you need to be careful now [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 28 OP

Meh.... Happy Hoosier Sep 28 #1

...as long as "total market" doesn't include... ret5hd Sep 28 #5

Trump alone can fix it. bucolic_frolic Sep 28 #2

EO .................. Lovie777 Sep 28 #3

Isn't there a pending SCOTUS case challenging the power of the executive branch to regulate? Fiendish Thingy Sep 28 #4

I'm fine with someone investing their own money in anything legal. Silent Type Sep 28 #6

My advisor will be told: NO "alternative assets". Period. N/t CousinIT Sep 28 #7