Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowflake Thiel plans to leave California over a f*cking ONE PERCENT "billionaires tax." ONE F*CKING PERCENT. [View all]FBaggins
(28,619 posts)12. That's over a billion dollars for him
Avoiding a billion dollar expense by simply picking a new place to live sounds like an easy decision.
And its likely much more than that since his net worth is tied up in assets that would draw large capital gains taxes federally and in California if he had to sell them to pay the tax.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Snowflake Thiel plans to leave California over a f*cking ONE PERCENT "billionaires tax." ONE F*CKING PERCENT. [View all]
Miles Archer
Saturday
OP
Those poor Brits. The ultra right has done a great job of ginning raw hate up against immigrants, and
PatrickforB
Saturday
#71
Always sad to see folks openly embrace authoritarianism and pine for their own dictator.
tritsofme
22 hrs ago
#92
The ultra-rich can easily borrow against their assets to avoid triggering capital gains
unblock
Saturday
#14
Bye bye Fuck face. You should move to Russia, Putin will help you save your pennies.
Autumn
Saturday
#19
I wonder if a retroactive penalty tax would be legal should they leave for that reason.
cstanleytech
Saturday
#24
Obviously his only principle in life is profit above all, no matter how small. What a small human being.
Martin68
Saturday
#25
In addition to 16th amendment arguments, there's also a good argument that the apportionment rule applies
still-prayin4rain
Saturday
#75
It was needed at the time because a later overturned SC case was the law of the land.
still-prayin4rain
Saturday
#79
He would say it is the principle because he and most of his other oligarch companions' only
Bev54
Saturday
#46
Wish they would all move to their compounds in Honduras and Costa Rica to live out their little randian fantasies.
pecosbob
Saturday
#48
I'm appalled that my state wants a 1% increase in taxes for those with wealth over 1 billion dollars.
Buddyzbuddy
Saturday
#61
They want their personal money in some place like Texas, but their investments still here.
paulkienitz
Saturday
#80