General Discussion

dlk

(13,209 posts)

38. The song, however it's been produced, is not flat

Sun Feb 8, 2026, 10:48 AM

Sunday

That was my point. I love Bruce Springsteen but I could hardly listen to his song about Minneapolis because of all of the flat singing.

It was not a comment in support of AI produced material.

Take a breath.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Irish version... [View all] markie Feb 7 OP

Something about Celtic music that makes this song an historically epic ballad. cbabe Feb 7 #1

It's AI slop. It's machine-generated fraud ripping off Springsteen. highplainsdem Feb 7 #14

Sorry. Sure fooled me. cbabe Feb 7 #28

You and others. It was intended to fool people, or it would have been labeled AI very openly. I'm sorry highplainsdem Feb 7 #29

At least they're not singing flat dlk Feb 7 #35

No one is singing. A machine is producing notes. highplainsdem Feb 7 #36

The song, however it's been produced, is not flat dlk Sunday #38

This message was self-deleted by its author Deuxcents Feb 7 #2

Done by a machine. It's AI slop. See reply 12. highplainsdem Feb 7 #15

Lovely malaise Feb 7 #3

Please don't spread AI slop that rips off Springsteen. See reply 12. highplainsdem Feb 7 #16

Since Bruce has some Irish ancestry even more appropriate. Sounds good. TY! electric_blue68 Feb 7 #4

The Irish can sing it from their own bloodied history RVN VET71 Feb 7 #5

True, this. electric_blue68 Feb 7 #7

There's no one Irish on this AI slop generated by a YouTuber in Israel ripping off other famous musicians as well. highplainsdem Feb 7 #18

I am one-quarter Irish me-self Fritz Walter Feb 7 #11

In NYC home to many Irish-Americans.... electric_blue68 Feb 7 #17

It's AI, not Irish. highplainsdem Feb 7 #19

Oh, well... disappointing, then. electric_blue68 Feb 7 #20

Disappointing, fraudulent, and probably stealing clicks, attention and money from real artists. highplainsdem Feb 7 #21

How can you tell? Asking as a person very ignorant of AI duplicity RVN VET71 Sunday #37

See reply 12, the first reply I posted here. In this case the YouTuber admitted in the video description - highplainsdem Sunday #39

Thanks RVN VET71 Monday #40

Generative AI and everything produced with it IS criminal, because those AI tools are trained illegally on highplainsdem Monday #41

Well done! Passing it along. mn9driver Feb 7 #6

It's AI slop that rips off Springsteen's great song. highplainsdem Feb 7 #22

Fuck this AI slop. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 7 #8

"Artist" is Israeli, and it is probably AI muriel_volestrangler Feb 7 #9

Definitely AI. See reply 12. highplainsdem Feb 7 #13

Unrec... AI demmiblue Feb 7 #10

You may like it, but I'd bet Springsteen would hate this AI slop version ripping off his work. So disrespectful highplainsdem Feb 7 #12

I originally thought this was a tribute to Springsteen but out of respect, I'm deleting my post Deuxcents Feb 7 #23

I'm sorry it tricked you. I hate this sort of AI-enabled fraud, and it's all over YouTube now. That YouTuber highplainsdem Feb 7 #25

Not a techie but glad you and others are here to warn us..rarely get on YouTube but do get it here Deuxcents Feb 7 #26

You're very welcome! I wish we didn't have to watch out for these AI-using frauds. highplainsdem Feb 7 #31

Another plague Deuxcents Feb 7 #32

What a coincidence canetoad Feb 7 #24

BTW, that account has another AI video posted titled, "Pray for the Left." demmiblue Feb 7 #27

Ugh. That's really disgusting. And that YouTuber, Ethan Gontar, has two AI versions of that song, one highplainsdem Feb 7 #30

Thank you for looking at the slop there carefully enough to notice that AI atrocity of an atrocious RW song. highplainsdem Feb 7 #33

I was fooled enough to post it, too. I deleted mine. Aristus Feb 7 #34