Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WSHazel

(661 posts)
23. I understand what the words say
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 11:29 AM
23 hrs ago

They already made a massive revision to 2024, and now they are making another massive revision. The BLS is saying that its original estimate was revised down by 60% over the next two years. Incidentally, both massive downward revisions occurred under a President that constantly attacks the prior President who was originally credited with the job growth.

Has there ever been an 800,000 job downward revision to two years earlier in the history of the BLS?

I don't know if you are a closet MAGA or why you are taking it this personally, but the numbers look like bulls***, and the market agrees with me on this.

You can keep calling me stupid and provide all the links you want, I know I am right, and I think you know I am right too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yet the billionaires Trump sycophants keep artificially inflating the Stock Market. Chasstev365 Yesterday #1
What you're seeing is a total divorce for working people and economic indicators Johnny2X2X Yesterday #3
It's not billionaires doing that, it is us WSHazel Yesterday #4
If you believe this report, UpInArms Yesterday #2
Does this count all the jobs lost? nt leftyladyfrommo Yesterday #5
We need to add 140,000 jobs per month to keep up with population growth Johnny2X2X Yesterday #6
There is no statistical justification for pulling 800,000 jobs out of 2024 WSHazel Yesterday #7
You have no clue what you're talking about Wiz Imp Yesterday #12
Slow your roll WSHazel Yesterday #15
There was a change in how small businesses are calculated EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #16
I get that for the most part WSHazel Yesterday #18
Last time I respond to you but to repeat, you have no clue how the Benchmark revision process works. Wiz Imp 23 hrs ago #21
I understand what the words say WSHazel 23 hrs ago #23
Extremely weak & misleading explanation. Wiz Imp 23 hrs ago #19
Not necessarily. EdmondDantes_ 22 hrs ago #28
Wow! Dunning Kruger in action! Wiz Imp Yesterday #17
Are you being deliberately obtuse? WSHazel 23 hrs ago #20
Right here: Wiz Imp 23 hrs ago #22
Just so we are aware of your position WSHazel 23 hrs ago #25
🙄 Wiz Imp 23 hrs ago #26
One final thing. Wiz Imp 22 hrs ago #27
Not a hard concept WSHazel 11 hrs ago #31
I do not believe we added 130,000 jobs in January 2026 OrlandoDem2 Yesterday #8
That's not a good number Johnny2X2X Yesterday #9
How has unemployment not gone higher? Johonny Yesterday #10
It's risen some, like a half point Johnny2X2X Yesterday #11
Media making it sound like these job numbers Johonny Yesterday #13
These numbers are a total disaster Johnny2X2X Yesterday #14
Because many people, myself included, just stop looking TexasBushwhacker 23 hrs ago #24
MaddowBlog-New report shows 2025 was even worse for U.S. job market than we thought LetMyPeopleVote 20 hrs ago #29
I'm old enough to remember Johnny2X2X 19 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BLS jobs report revises 2...»Reply #23