Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Trump administration losing credibility with judges and grand juries [View all]
Trump administration losing credibility with judges and grand juries a former federal judge explains why this is remarkable and unprecedentedPublished: February 11, 2026 4:16pm EST
The word unprecedented is getting a workout after a grand jury in Washington on Feb. 10, 2026, rebuffed an attempt by federal prosecutors to get an indictment against perceived enemies of President Donald Trump.
It began with an unprecedented video in November 2025 featuring six Democratic lawmakers alerting members of the military that they had the duty to disobey illegal orders. That enraged Trump, who in an unprecedented move said the lawmakers were guilty of sedition, which is punishable by death. The U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro, made the unprecedented attempt to indict the lawmakers. The final element in this drama the federal grand jurys rejection of Pirros request wasnt itself unprecedented. Thats because its only the latest in an unprecedented string of losses for the Trump administration before grand juries.
Dickinson College President John E. Jones III, a former federal judge, spoke with The Conversation politics editor Naomi Schalit about the role of grand juries, why a grand jury would not indict someone and how all of this is a reflection of the administrations remarkable loss of credibility with judges and the citizens who make up grand juries.
How does the grand jury process work?
The grand jury really dates back to before the Bill of Rights, but for our purposes its memorialized in the Fifth Amendment within the Bill of Rights. It is meant to be a mechanism that screens cases brought by prosecutors.
....(snip)....
Why would a grand jury refuse to give the prosecutor what they want?
Its unprecedented, although we now see a wave of grand juries pushing back against the government. I dont recall a single instance, during the almost 20 years I served as a U.S. District judge, when a grand jury refused to return a true bill, an indictment. It just is completely aberrational. The grand jury would have to totally reject the whole premise of the case thats being presented to them by the United States attorney because, remember, there are typically no witnesses appearing before the grand jury to dispute the facts. The grand jury is clearly saying, Even accepting the facts youre putting before us as true, we dont think under these circumstances this case is worthy of a federal indictment.
....(snip)....
Were seeing that time and again in appearances in court where judges simply dont believe what U.S. attorneys are telling them, based on past demonstrable falsehoods that have been stated in open court. And now we see grand juries that are also doubting the credibility of federal prosecutors. And these grand jurors are not blind to what is taking place in the world around them.
....(snip)....
What does it mean if you have a court system, judges and the grand juries who do not have faith in the administration and its legal claims?
Its a complete drag on our system of justice. For all of the time that I sat on the federal bench, I had great respect for the Department of Justice, and the department had tremendous credibility. They were straight shooters. The prosecutors who appeared in front of me were professionals. I didnt always agree with their arguments, of course, nor did I agree with a few of their charging decisions, but I can tell you that not once did I see a federal prosecution in front of me that I felt strongly should never have been brought at its inception.
But we now have a system where, because of the whims of the president, the Department of Justice has become utterly weaponized against his perceived enemies, and thats a gross misuse of our prosecutorial power at the federal level. ........................(more)
https://theconversation.com/trump-administration-losing-credibility-with-judges-and-grand-juries-a-former-federal-judge-explains-why-this-is-remarkable-and-unprecedented-275741
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies