Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ted Lieu: "allegations of Donald Trump raping children ... of Donald Trump threatening to kill children. " [View all]AZJonnie
(3,341 posts)104. Are you this far into this discussion, saying mean things to me, NOT having looked into who said all that yet?
To reveal the mystery, that interview was with Bradley Edwards, in May 2025.
Are you familiar with that name?
A victims' rights lawyer from Florida, Edwards has been in pursuit of the truth about financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's life and crimes for nearly two decades. He would be the first to say that Epstein caused incalculable damage and trauma to hundreds of women and girls.
In fact, long before Epstein became known worldwide for his crimes, Edwards presciently told a federal judge, "Because of [Epstein's] deviant appetite for young girls, combined with his extraordinary wealth and power, he may just be the most dangerous sexual predator in U.S. history."
That was 17 years ago. Back then, hardly anyone listened.
In the years since, Edwards and his co-counsel -- on behalf of Epstein's victims -- have sued Epstein, his estate, the federal government and several financial institutions, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for more than 200 survivors of Epstein's sex abuse and trafficking. He knows the victims' stories as well as anyone and, in the course of all the litigation, he has reviewed an expansive amount of non-public documents and evidence related to the late Epstein, who died by suicide in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking of minors.
In fact, long before Epstein became known worldwide for his crimes, Edwards presciently told a federal judge, "Because of [Epstein's] deviant appetite for young girls, combined with his extraordinary wealth and power, he may just be the most dangerous sexual predator in U.S. history."
That was 17 years ago. Back then, hardly anyone listened.
In the years since, Edwards and his co-counsel -- on behalf of Epstein's victims -- have sued Epstein, his estate, the federal government and several financial institutions, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for more than 200 survivors of Epstein's sex abuse and trafficking. He knows the victims' stories as well as anyone and, in the course of all the litigation, he has reviewed an expansive amount of non-public documents and evidence related to the late Epstein, who died by suicide in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking of minors.
So what is your theory with regards to why Bradley Edwards would go out of his way to downplay the whole 'pedo cabal' angle (as did 18 years of FBI analysis over 6 POTUS terms, 3 of them Democrats), while, to your thinking, *his own, long-time clients* are out "testifying" the exact opposite?
I'm suggesting they're actually NOT saying that, but if they did, I'd believe them. You said I've missed dozens of your posts that would prove otherwise, so, I invite you to show me I'm wrong, friend. I'm all ears
I'm not claiming I'm "so smart", I'm claiming I've paid very close attention. Neither evidence, nor victim testimony proving that Epstein was trafficking many minors to many men has ever materialized. Guiffre? I believe her accounts in Nobody's Girl. But she is the only who's said she was sent to his rich friends, and only claimed it about herself (almost every time, at least). And she clearly occupied a different place in their world than the other victims. I could explain why, but my hands are tired already.
Lastly I humbly ask that you PLEASE not insult me again if you've not read the two articles. You'll need to in order to understand at least why *I believe* I'm not talking out my ass here. I believe I'm accurately reporting what is known vs. what is not known, and there's no predetermined outcome involved.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ted Lieu: "allegations of Donald Trump raping children ... of Donald Trump threatening to kill children. " [View all]
sheshe2
Yesterday
OP
Did anyone here ever imagine that we would see the US sink to a level
Whyisthisstillclose
Yesterday
#1
Did anyone here ever imagine that the media and a large part of the country are okay with it
durablend
Yesterday
#9
I don't think they're okay with it, just don't believe it either because they're MAGA or can't accept such things happen
ChicagoTeamster
Yesterday
#12
Bezos' was strictly a business decision, as was Paramount/CBS, as was ABC.
ificandream
4 hrs ago
#116
Sink to? Sally Hemings might like a word. IMO the real hope was that we had finally risen above...
Ol Janx Spirit
Yesterday
#13
This kind of debauchery and cruelty are not new. All one needs is to remember about the Hellfire Club in England and
Texin
Yesterday
#21
It is a much more complicated discussion, but there is good evidence that it is the evil...
Ol Janx Spirit
18 hrs ago
#92
No, but I never expected to see a ruskie ASSet in the WH either, ruling like a mob boss.
SheltieLover
Yesterday
#33
My question is why did so many think we were living in a freaking Utopia?? (n/t)
OldBaldy1701E
9 hrs ago
#110
I think she leaves the Epstein files to other late-night commentators. I'd rather hear Jen Psaki and especially
generalbetrayus
Yesterday
#14
Maybe it makes her physically ill. This has that effect on some people. I'm one of them.
SheltieLover
Yesterday
#35
Demanding the extrajudicial murder of people over mundane emails to Epstein is not "the moderate, level-headed position"
AZJonnie
Yesterday
#55
"agents couldn't confirm that and found no other victims telling a similar story,"
Wiz Imp
23 hrs ago
#68
I don't care who said that. It's a fact that many victims have provided testimony that
Wiz Imp
21 hrs ago
#83
Are you this far into this discussion, saying mean things to me, NOT having looked into who said all that yet?
AZJonnie
15 hrs ago
#104
I've shown solid sources for my current working thesis, and you have shown nothing but personal insults and *opinion*
AZJonnie
2 hrs ago
#119
I ignore many, many Epstein posts I disagree with, but on THIS topic, yes I will often comment
AZJonnie
Yesterday
#57
Okay, well ya got me! I should have gone back and re-read it, I took your word for it
AZJonnie
21 hrs ago
#82
OH ABSOLUTELY!!! I'm saying I probably vaguely recalled seeing video of Ted saying "evidence" just days ago
AZJonnie
17 hrs ago
#102
So brilliant one, If the tips were anonymous then why is the name on all of them redacted?
Wiz Imp
5 hrs ago
#114
It's surprising to me how much control there actually is over the media right now.
hamsterjill
Yesterday
#31
WTG Rep. Lieu! For a story that was six months ago declared dead on arrival
Torchlight
Yesterday
#38
the motherfucking child rapist POTUS needs to resign... but will Republicans pressure him?
LymphocyteLover
21 hrs ago
#85
Thank you, Ted Lieu, for stating loud and clear that in the files, Trump is accused of RAPING CHILDREN.
LaMouffette
9 hrs ago
#109