General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ted Lieu: "allegations of Donald Trump raping children ... of Donald Trump threatening to kill children. " [View all]Wiz Imp
(9,494 posts)Spoke with caller
2 voicemails left, no response received.
Complainant was spoken to and deemed not credible.
Spoken with twice.
Voicemail left
complainant did not have confirmed information
The FBI spoke directly to these people and/or had their contact information. Those are not anonymous tips. Only one entry on that document said No contact information provided. That was an anonymous tip.
It is clear from that document that most of the tips were not anonymous. Most were not from the actual alleged victims but that doesn't make them anonymous. Just because they were determined to be "not credible" doesn't mean they were anonymous. Nor does it automatically mean they were not true. It means someone decided it wasn't worth investigating. It wouldn't be the first time law enforcement deemed a tip not credible that was later determined to be telling the truth.
Also, it appears most of these were just dismissed with no real investigation. Everything could be investigated. For example this one:
where Jeffrey Epstein, Sammy Sosa, and Donald
Trump were in attendance. Patti LaBelle's PR agent
stood at the door. At the party, caller met an
individual who was approximately 18 to 23 years of
age, who was brought from Oklahoma for a
modeling job but then sold to a man in France.
Several women were being auctioned, and a woman
possibly known as Colette LNU was the madam. A
couple of years later, caller saw Colette at the
Cheetah Club in New York, NY. and she told one of
Santos friends that Jamie Foxx was interested in
spending a night with her, and that he could pay her
a lot money.
Interviews should have been conducted with people mentioned. That doesn't appear to have been done.
And we know Maria Farmer's tip she called in was totally ignored for at least 10 years.
I'm not claiming to necessarily believe any speciic tips are absolutely true, just pointing out that most were not anonymous and even if anonymous, more investigation could have and should have been done. Finally, for the claims they said they did investigate, why have they not released the documents recording the details of what the investigation found?