Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Nothing to Cheer About [View all]

ancianita

(43,225 posts)
30. I hear you. But
Sat Feb 28, 2026, 07:49 PM
Yesterday

the American people must use the Internet we put into the world to demand that it know we are not a monolith and that the psychopath does not and never will act in the name of 77% of Americans.

While some of us are good people, our country is not.

We The People ARE THE COUNTRY.

Americans are NOT who or what they are called. AMERICANS ARE ONLY WHAT THEY ANSWER TO.
THAT same principle applies to all humans.

You may not presume to drag 77% of the country into what the psychopathic leader of the 23 % is doing. Your anger is irrational -- and perhaps an emotional habit that you hyper-rationalize -- particularly in this international context.
We mustn't succumb to that.

Nor should any of us succumb to the temptation of calling all Iranians as evil as their leaders. Right? Think about it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Israeli–United_States_strikes_on_Iran

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nothing to Cheer About [View all] angrychair Yesterday OP
Do you think the US will attack France? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #1
Yes, I do think they would attack France angrychair Yesterday #5
Kidnapping/killing the leader of a NATO nuclear power is indeed crazy talk. Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #6
I have zero doubts they would angrychair Yesterday #8
It's not a metter of cahones MadameButterfly Yesterday #24
I do not believe he will attack a nuclear NATO nation. Nt Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #27
which of krasnov's "advisors" would tell him "no??" rampartd 4 hrs ago #33
The ones that don't want their families to die in a nuclear war Fiendish Thingy 4 hrs ago #34
By this logic, we are incentivizing all countries MadameButterfly Yesterday #22
And what if... 2naSalit Yesterday #2
Too difficult lame54 Yesterday #4
I think... 2naSalit Yesterday #7
That's hardly the point choie Yesterday #15
The point is, would that be the right thing to do and would you support it? Iggo 23 hrs ago #32
The first place that needs to be bombed is a home in Palm Beach named mar a lago on a Saturday afternoon. kimbutgar Yesterday #13
Hell, even I would nominate them for the Nobel Peace Prize if they got rid of Trump. Bev54 Yesterday #23
Cuba is next lame54 Yesterday #3
I was thinking the exact same thing yliza Yesterday #25
I'll shed no tears for the ayotolla but... Takket Yesterday #9
An Iranian civil war is a real possibility. roamer65 Yesterday #10
That's not my point angrychair Yesterday #11
I can't believe anyone on this board choie Yesterday #16
How far have we fallen? Cirsium Yesterday #17
I wish someone would liberate us from Trump and his ass kissing goon squad. Initech Yesterday #12
Why does this feel like this could end up being like what happened to Libya? tornado34jh Yesterday #14
DURec leftstreet Yesterday #18
Maybe I'm nuts, hoosierspud Yesterday #19
It would not be Mossad. It would be wnylib 4 hrs ago #35
I just made a statement that said basically the same thing slightlv Yesterday #20
I'm worried about how quiet Russia and China have been and what's been negotiated? Ilikepurple Yesterday #21
Right. Nothing. ancianita Yesterday #26
I wish that were true angrychair Yesterday #29
I hear you. But ancianita Yesterday #30
Horrible person indeed. Though seems to me B.See Yesterday #28
Agree JustAnotherGen 23 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nothing to Cheer About»Reply #30