Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's TREASON not sedition [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(22,928 posts)23. The goalposts remain the same
The topic of conversation is:
Does Trumps conduct meet the legal definition of treason? And secondarily, what is the legal definition of the federal crime of treason?
You say yes for reasons (definitely not feelings
) that are not connected to or supported by any definition of treason in federal law that has ever been successfully charged and a conviction obtained .
And I disagree with your position because of facts and reality, as described in my prior posts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've read all your posts in this thread, and I didn't know any of them were "tongue in cheek" until I came to this one.
ShazzieB
17 hrs ago
#48
I would be in favor of rendering him to The Hague once his term is over
Fiendish Thingy
22 hrs ago
#35
Of course the "experts" on what is treason wlll be out in force. Maybe add quotes around it "treason"
erronis
Wednesday
#6
The Democratic party is timid. Plays nice too often. Democrats who can hid hard are marginalize by the leadership.
Denvermosaic
Wednesday
#11
What did Krasnov do w/ all that purloined classified material he moved to Merde-A-Loco???
ultralite001
20 hrs ago
#46