It's a MYSTERY! Trump admin court filing "loaded with exclamation points, misplaced caps, multiple adjectives..."

[Ocelot II]

2. I hate f&cking Raw Story. I had to click through a couple of links to find the filing itself,

which is here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73127510/01208837520/national-trust-for-historic-preservation-v-nps/ Why the hell couldn't Raw Story have cited the thing itself instead of forcing readers to dig for it in other sources? That said, the introduction and fact statement, complete with inappropriate capitalizations and exaggerations, do sound like they were written by Piggy himself:

Among other issues, the old East Wing was in very dangerous and poor condition, and totally vulnerable to attack by even the most basic of Military weaponry, but especially now with the new advanced technologies of drones, missiles, much more powerful rifles, and other emerging national-security technologies and threats. The original East Wing has been completely rebuilt, many times over, with columns being knocked down, put back, and then taken out again, a common red brick addition added haphazardly on top of the original very small structure (to the chagrin of many!), and severely damaged during the process of the Military building large Top Secret spaces below the original structure. In other words, the East Wing, prior to demolition, was a completely different building than that which was designed many years ago.

The argument itself was probably written by the lawyers without input from Himself, although that is also ridiculous. Basically, the argument is that the injunction shouldn't have been granted because now there's a big ugly hole on the WH grounds that can't be filled - failing to mention the fact that the big ugly hole is there only because Trump tore down the East Wing without seeking or getting permission.