snip
In granting this shocking, unprecedented, and improper injunction, one that could have been sought long ago, prior to the start of construction (in that there was full knowledge, through large scale media attention and publicity, that the White House ballroom was planned to be built, and there would have been a great deal of time for them to object, long before the start of construction, even though their objection would likewise have been baseless and frivolous), the district court took the erroneous, sweeping view that Congress did not authorize the ballroom construction at the White House—yet correctly allows construction “necessary to ensure the safety and security of the White House and its grounds, including the ballroom construction site, and provide for the personal safety of the President and his staff.”
snip
Effing moron doesn't have the slightest idea on how to construct a legal or any other kind of argument.
I am absolutely convinced the attorneys have adopted the strategy of letting him destroy himself. He is his own best enemy.
on edit:
I have read more and am delighted to tell you there are many 130-word sentences. 
Edit history
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read