Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdmondDantes_

(1,933 posts)
129. That's not the post I was referring to
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 03:58 PM
Monday

The poster has since deleted it, but here's the quote.

"The one victim is dicey at best because the bar they went to, she got drunk, I mean really drunk and he offered to put her in an Uber. She wanted to.go.home with him. I mean kinda person gets drunk with a man and then goes back to his apartment? Then she comes back 4 years later to get drunk with him again? Something ain't right here."

So no, I'm not being disingenuous. You might want to consider what you're being in falsely attacking me. Presumptuous is a word that comes to mind.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

KNR niyad Monday #1
Tribes protect valuable members. OC375 Monday #2
It's California Bettie Monday #4
Agreed. OC375 Monday #5
Which makes the question posed in the article even more compelling. yardwork Monday #12
If this was known Bettie Monday #3
Yes. "Open Secret?" I certainly had not heard the rumblings but perhaps within the beltway... hlthe2b Monday #6
"So, yeah. It appears the pump was fully primed on Friday within the circles who fully "knew" but amazing to me, did not WhiskeyGrinder Monday #8
I Believe The Term Refers To Those Working With Or For Swalwell, Not "Us". ColoringFool Monday #78
My daughter is a CA Dem delegate and a caucus chair, and she had never heard those rumors. deurbano Monday #93
I concur. In this world there are "upstanders" snd Ninga Monday #104
I have never come across any decent humans who are cheaters jfz9580m Monday #124
Same here.... I guess 'open secret' meant within the House of Reps ONLY--- Jack Valentino Monday #145
Exactly WSHazel Monday #7
One of the reasons I didn't quite believe it at first Bettie Monday #9
Madoff is the epitome of this behavior WSHazel Monday #59
Broken stair analogy, plus organizations like to hold on to high performers, even when they're terrible people. WhiskeyGrinder Monday #10
And the biggest missing stair in our politics happens to be President! (n/t) thesquanderer Monday #94
Arnold Schwarzenegger fathered a son with the family's housekeeper, kept the child a secret while he was sop Monday #11
The sad fact is that a lot of men get away with it. yardwork Monday #16
Thank you jfz9580m Monday #27
Just to be clear, a lot of the "wait and see" was about not SEEING all the facts yet RandomNumbers Monday #28
Wait and see is one thing. yardwork Monday #31
Yes, I agree with you on that point. RandomNumbers Monday #35
It has helped me make a final decision jfz9580m Monday #77
"Immediately blaming every woman in sight is something else." MorbidButterflyTat Monday #123
Nope. I'm not calling out any DUer. yardwork Monday #128
There was someone here yesterday asking what was expected if a drunk woman goes to a man's hotel room EdmondDantes_ Monday #45
Should be asking, why would a responsible man RandomNumbers Monday #67
More than one poster suggested that the bank accounts of the victims needed to be investigated MichMan Monday #68
The question was MorbidButterflyTat Monday #125
That's not the post I was referring to EdmondDantes_ Monday #129
I have seen post, that in my opinion suggest voting for him Lifeafter70 Monday #60
That's what stood out to me jfz9580m Monday #82
It is VERY sad that a Democrat who has been so effective against Trump, Jack Valentino Monday #146
Based on Arnold, obviously he had a good reason to think so. LisaL Monday #62
I had no idea this was an open secret. Disgusting. Passages Monday #13
People thought the party was taking crazy pills Sympthsical Monday #14
I imagine the Republicans were hoping he'd be the nominee. yardwork Monday #17
I still haven't heard a credible explanation from "The timing is suspicious!" crowd Sympthsical Monday #19
There was a spontaneous eruption of that phrase on DU. yardwork Monday #20
Hasn't hurt many of the GOP members samplegirl Monday #15
The death of accountability is a good headline. yardwork Monday #18
The difference between virtue signalling and actual virtue on full display Sympthsical Monday #21
And every other woman in sight was blamed, too. yardwork Monday #23
I think Katie Porter will actually be hurt by this Scrivener7 Monday #25
Absolutely. She's getting the Hillary Clinton Kamala Harris treatment. yardwork Monday #37
There's another element here. She's running against a man people liked a lot who turned out to be a dog. Scrivener7 Monday #44
On the other hand - I suspect many Democratic voters will now see her as more of a sure bet peppertree Monday #54
As a former CA member of the House, she was in karynnj Monday #92
Probably true. Scrivener7 Monday #102
OMG, nobody said anything like that on here. MorbidButterflyTat Monday #135
She clearly is being hit on this karynnj Monday #90
Tribal reaction. Dems are not immune from it. paleotn Monday #49
Exactly! This is not a game, folks. paleotn Monday #43
there's been nothing but accountability from the party and Dem supporters, including Swalwell's bigtree Monday #143
nothing in that article backed up the claim that 'His sexual misconduct was an open secret' bigtree Monday #22
It was very much an open secret Sympthsical Monday #24
That's sad. I wonder if this was known more than locally? Many will blow it off as "just gossip" LeftInTX Monday #32
Unfortunately, it seems to be considered 'acceptable' for men to behave like that RandomNumbers Monday #33
For years. Incredible, one would imagine he was the only politician they could back. Passages Monday #36
Why encourage him to run for governor? MorbidButterflyTat Monday #132
"Everybody just turned a blind eye and went about their lives for years?" Sympthsical Monday #137
Kevin MCarthy on CNN question everything Monday #52
not one of the sources I'd trust for anything bigtree Monday #85
Whatever else is true about how "known" Swalwell's behavior was, My Kevin is not a reliable reporter. deurbano Monday #99
Kevin MCarthy??? MorbidButterflyTat Monday #131
I noticed the word "misconduct" people knew of his "misconduct" and chose to ignore it. But "misconduct" has now Ninga Monday #66
Stop blaming Nancy Pelosi. yardwork Monday #79
Excuse me. There are "upstanders" and "bystanders" Ninga Monday #107
Exactly. No matter their last name or gender. N/T AloeVera Monday #120
"Inappropriate" behaviour by a person in power is grooming. AloeVera Monday #119
Here is a possible explanation karynnj Monday #96
it's not clear anyone knew except the people claiming it was well known bigtree Monday #121
Just because you didn't know... Random Boomer Monday #100
internet gossip bigtree Monday #122
There is this tweet from Dec 2025 LeftInTX Monday #26
great reply Celerity Monday #29
what did he do with that information bigtree Monday #41
The answer is right in the article. Nanjeanne Monday #47
more background as well Celerity Monday #57
He's an interesting read. Did you see this one? Sympthsical Monday #69
I figured as much. Unless Becerra finds rocket fuel and blows up out of his months-long 2 to 5 per cent level, it looks, Celerity Monday #88
I see the problem with Becerra Sympthsical Monday #97
"...what did both of these men do other than this political chit-chat on social media?" WhiskeyGrinder Monday #48
that's still just conjecture bigtree Monday #86
Because the victims had to come forward Sympthsical Monday #51
That's how it was with Tony Gonzales. LeftInTX Monday #70
Yep. Just like Weinstein and Ronan Farrow Sympthsical Monday #81
The comments made by some poster here Lifeafter70 Monday #72
Humans gonna human Sympthsical Monday #84
Threat of lawsuit? RoseTrellis Monday #65
Wow. Passages Monday #42
The Democratic Party doesn't allow this kind of behavor. Escape Monday #30
True. Shades of Gary Hart. peppertree Monday #46
Wait-a-sec mr715 Monday #111
Sure. peppertree Monday #113
I'll have to check out Ms. Kelley's book. mr715 Monday #114
That could have something to do with it peppertree Monday #116
Thanks for the insight mr715 Monday #133
You're very welcome peppertree Monday #140
Well, The Democratic Party Apparently Does So "Allow," Until...., ColoringFool Monday #80
True - but at least they have limits peppertree Monday #105
Sent me to the all knowing internet to find out who Rielle Hunter is... Escape Monday #136
Nobody wants to be the messenger. milestogo Monday #34
That's true... LeftInTX Monday #38
The Gary Hart of our times peppertree Monday #39
My exact thought this morning. paleotn Monday #50
Gary Hart may have been a reckless philanderer, but Jose Garcia Monday #56
There's still issues of consent going after a parade of young women EdmondDantes_ Monday #95
I believe the House introduced a resolution in 2018 prohibiting any sexual contact between a member and staff MichMan Monday #103
Luckily for Lady G, it didn't apply to the Senate peppertree Monday #106
"Accountability" only applies to Democrats. valleyrogue Monday #40
Sad - but true. And you see that in many other democracies. peppertree Monday #108
Gandhi??? LeftInTX Monday #126
So Gandhi was quite the dandy. peppertree Monday #141
Scene from the 1933 movie 42nd Street LeftInTX Monday #144
If party leadership knew about this & didn't discourage him from running for gov, then they're complicit, too. CrispyQ Monday #53
That's the part that got me Tree Lady Monday #74
The weird thing is jfz9580m Monday #55
He is resigning. Accountability is taking place. Martin68 Monday #58
Philandering is one thing but Billsdaughter Monday #61
"Was an open secret for a long time" sunnybrook Monday #63
The open secret appears to have been that he was sleeping around while married. LisaL Monday #64
If higher ups in the party knew, they shouldn't have encouraged him to run for governor. LeftInTX Monday #76
I agree. LisaL Monday #83
I'd like to see those sources too MorbidButterflyTat Monday #130
I think a lot of people just liked that Swalwell that was an attack dog against Trump and didn't care about much else MichMan Monday #71
Too many people repeat everything Trump says and seem to believe it as well Just_Vote_Dem Monday #75
that's not evident in anything bigtree Monday #87
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Monday #98
"The rumors that are being discussed as being generally known are of consensual relationships, not sexual assault or WhiskeyGrinder Monday #101
I never understood the Avenatti stanning. He always seemed like a plonker to me. I certianly never got invested in the Celerity Monday #91
DURec leftstreet Monday #73
I'm not a fan of situational ethics. democrank Monday #89
Yes. And a horror I have heard applauded jfz9580m Monday #112
How soon we forget Edwards and other Dem 'womanizers' JCMach1 Monday #109
How soon we forget Edwards and other Dem 'womanizers' JCMach1 Monday #110
I mean like, what 50 year old man sends dick pics to his girlfriends? Jersey Devil Monday #115
This is another dispiriting revelation peggysue2 Monday #117
Power does strange things to some people MustLoveBeagles Monday #139
I have counter evidence for the last sentence. My daughter endorsed Swalwell before hearing any rumors, then "quickly deurbano Monday #118
Obviously most of us (in general public) LisaL Monday #127
I certainly did not, even thoI fancy myself to be rather well informed. 3catwoman3 Monday #134
With all due respect Sympthsical Monday #138
As The "Old Folks" Say..........🎶........ ColoringFool Monday #142
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eric Swalwell and the Dea...»Reply #129