Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cachukis

(4,120 posts)
31. No question. One of my worries is the takeover of
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 02:23 PM
Thursday

market responsibility having moved to an algorithmic response. It has simply made money for the sake of money. A wilfull blindness.
Visualize, the manager talking to his sales team asking for reports of progress, strategies, and successes and failures of activity during the last six months. The reps ask AI to accumulate the data and they turn that in. The manager gathers this information and asks his AI agent to assemble this in reportable form and submits it to his boss.
That boss is a computer that decides the next step.
We are already here.
Reminds me of Malthus predicting population growth would be subject to food supply.
Reminds me of a conversation I had with my wife's best friend some years ago in Paris, TN.
I asked her why the poorest people in Kentucky continued to vote against Obamacare. They actually received benefits from Kenect (sic) the Kentucky version of Obamacare. She said their pride in overcoming hardship was a motivating factor. They couldn't afford dentists, but the occassional success of brandishing a tattoo, while small, mattered a lot.
Business resilience seems to be holding for now.
Saw through the pandemic where many of the predictions of economic calamity turned out to be underwhelming. The tariffs were supposed to cause much strife, but businesses, having raised their prices during the pandemic without reducing them later, were able to assuage pricing increases to less than what was expected.
At some point, the cavalcade of economic pressures might blow the steamer, but so far the whistles, while disquieting, have kept the engine still running.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The shit is on the wing orangecrush Thursday #1
The storage cushion is fudgy. bucolic_frolic Thursday #2
President Bone Spurs had a plan to get out of Vietnam. Emile Thursday #3
Daddy's not buying his way out of this one. dem4decades Thursday #4
From another perspective cachukis Thursday #5
there's definitely been some adaptation... but still a lot has been kept afloat by the reserves that are likely to run LymphocyteLover Thursday #27
No question. One of my worries is the takeover of cachukis Thursday #31
Absolutely. I totally agree on all those points. The stock market is particularly a mess IMO LymphocyteLover Thursday #32
Have invested mostly in real estate over the last cachukis Thursday #34
Why would " Diesel goes first"??? Melon Thursday #6
800,000 to 1.2 million SamuelTheThird Thursday #11
It's one country. Multiply across all oil producing Melon Thursday #41
Yes, but the key is how long the strait stays closed and how quickly the reserves run out LymphocyteLover Thursday #28
Diesel is often made from mideastern crude while gasoline is made from US crude JT45242 Thursday #30
Not In The US, Though ProfessorGAC 17 hrs ago #45
Completely wrong. GreatGazoo Thursday #7
lol@your link SamuelTheThird Thursday #10
You ignored all the numbers to nitpick about semantics GreatGazoo Thursday #15
Are America's strategic reserves at a 40 year low right before the summer season? SamuelTheThird Thursday #19
Traders in Singapore, Beijing and Mumbai aren't duped by whatever Trump says GreatGazoo Thursday #36
This message was self-deleted by its author LymphocyteLover Thursday #29
Futures Are Not Delivery modrepub Thursday #39
"futures price contracts probably isn't a good predictor of actual future prices" -- meaning spot prices, yes GreatGazoo Thursday #42
Future Prices Are Not Necessarily modrepub 19 hrs ago #43
No. For anyone holding a March contract at $63 their price in March was $63 GreatGazoo 18 hrs ago #44
Appreciate your insight as I'm an admitted economic idiot. I can see where Exxon would be trying to "warn" Cheezoholic Thursday #21
Futures lock in a price right now GreatGazoo Thursday #22
Admittedly, Im no expert or even amateur...but SamuelTheThird Thursday #35
Since oil is sold as futures there is more profit when buyers panic about the future GreatGazoo Thursday #37
All hinging on a deal that isn't going to happen SamuelTheThird Thursday #38
Last week Exxon Mobil warned that oil inventories will fall to record low levels in coming weeks LymphocyteLover Thursday #33
Demand destruction WSHazel Thursday #8
"one of the key reasons that Trump started this conflict was to increase energy prices"-- agree LymphocyteLover Thursday #25
And it's all part of the plan... 2naSalit Thursday #9
Excellent summation. Kid Berwyn Thursday #12
I don't think the Strait of Hormuz never reopening is going to happen, but it will not reopen without a major shock ToxMarz Thursday #13
Agree. Thanks for the link. LymphocyteLover Thursday #24
Kick dalton99a Thursday #14
MAGA does the full collapse kairos12 Thursday #16
First the bastids want to grift off it, if they can. GreenWave Thursday #17
But I thouight it would be open in two weeks. AverageOldGuy Thursday #18
That's the point. Blue Full Moon Thursday #20
Unbelievably awful LymphocyteLover Thursday #23
It's happening now as we speak. marble falls Thursday #26
Remember that the UAE left OPEC a few weeks ago WSHazel Thursday #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Strait of Hormuz d...»Reply #31