Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreatGazoo

(4,778 posts)
42. "futures price contracts probably isn't a good predictor of actual future prices" -- meaning spot prices, yes
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 07:44 PM
Thursday

But if the buyer is taking delivery in Cushing in September then the price of that contract today is the price. If I buy December delivery at $80 then they are obligated to deliver X amount of WTI to my trucks, railcars or pipeline in Cushing Oklahoma in December and I pay $80 even if spot goes to $200.

If I am just an investor then yes I have to resell that futures contract prior to the expiry date. I think we are focused on two different things -- futures as an investment vs futures as a way that major users of oil control and determine their future expenses.

I think we agree on all of that (?) but backwardation means the all of the global participants in the oil markets, both buyers and sellers collectively, are predicting that the supply vs demand in December will produce a lower price than supply vs demand right now.

Front month spiked but the December end didn't move much:

Since war broke out between the U.S., Israel and Iran on February 28, the crude oil futures curve has moved into a steep backwardation, a situation that persists even after the announcement of a temporary ceasefire on April 7. Prices for WTI crude oil futures delivered in December 2026 have been as much as $40 below prices for delivery in May or June (Figure 1). This suggests that traders expect the current supply disruptions caused by the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz will most likely prove to be short-lived, with spot prices perhaps falling to the mid-$70s by year end. But what does the historically extreme backwardation imply for investors?

https://www.cmegroup.com/insights/economic-research/2026/implications-of-wti-oil-futures-in-backwardation-amid-the-supply-crunch.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The shit is on the wing orangecrush Thursday #1
The storage cushion is fudgy. bucolic_frolic Thursday #2
President Bone Spurs had a plan to get out of Vietnam. Emile Thursday #3
Daddy's not buying his way out of this one. dem4decades Thursday #4
From another perspective cachukis Thursday #5
there's definitely been some adaptation... but still a lot has been kept afloat by the reserves that are likely to run LymphocyteLover Thursday #27
No question. One of my worries is the takeover of cachukis Thursday #31
Absolutely. I totally agree on all those points. The stock market is particularly a mess IMO LymphocyteLover Thursday #32
Have invested mostly in real estate over the last cachukis Thursday #34
Why would " Diesel goes first"??? Melon Thursday #6
800,000 to 1.2 million SamuelTheThird Thursday #11
It's one country. Multiply across all oil producing Melon Thursday #41
Yes, but the key is how long the strait stays closed and how quickly the reserves run out LymphocyteLover Thursday #28
Diesel is often made from mideastern crude while gasoline is made from US crude JT45242 Thursday #30
Not In The US, Though ProfessorGAC Friday #45
Completely wrong. GreatGazoo Thursday #7
lol@your link SamuelTheThird Thursday #10
You ignored all the numbers to nitpick about semantics GreatGazoo Thursday #15
Are America's strategic reserves at a 40 year low right before the summer season? SamuelTheThird Thursday #19
Traders in Singapore, Beijing and Mumbai aren't duped by whatever Trump says GreatGazoo Thursday #36
This message was self-deleted by its author LymphocyteLover Thursday #29
Futures Are Not Delivery modrepub Thursday #39
"futures price contracts probably isn't a good predictor of actual future prices" -- meaning spot prices, yes GreatGazoo Thursday #42
Future Prices Are Not Necessarily modrepub Friday #43
No. For anyone holding a March contract at $63 their price in March was $63 GreatGazoo Friday #44
Appreciate your insight as I'm an admitted economic idiot. I can see where Exxon would be trying to "warn" Cheezoholic Thursday #21
Futures lock in a price right now GreatGazoo Thursday #22
Admittedly, Im no expert or even amateur...but SamuelTheThird Thursday #35
Since oil is sold as futures there is more profit when buyers panic about the future GreatGazoo Thursday #37
All hinging on a deal that isn't going to happen SamuelTheThird Thursday #38
Last week Exxon Mobil warned that oil inventories will fall to record low levels in coming weeks LymphocyteLover Thursday #33
Demand destruction WSHazel Thursday #8
"one of the key reasons that Trump started this conflict was to increase energy prices"-- agree LymphocyteLover Thursday #25
And it's all part of the plan... 2naSalit Thursday #9
Excellent summation. Kid Berwyn Thursday #12
I don't think the Strait of Hormuz never reopening is going to happen, but it will not reopen without a major shock ToxMarz Thursday #13
Agree. Thanks for the link. LymphocyteLover Thursday #24
Kick dalton99a Thursday #14
MAGA does the full collapse kairos12 Thursday #16
First the bastids want to grift off it, if they can. GreenWave Thursday #17
But I thouight it would be open in two weeks. AverageOldGuy Thursday #18
That's the point. Blue Full Moon Thursday #20
Unbelievably awful LymphocyteLover Thursday #23
It's happening now as we speak. marble falls Thursday #26
Remember that the UAE left OPEC a few weeks ago WSHazel Thursday #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Strait of Hormuz d...»Reply #42