Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(27,174 posts)
1. Hot stuff.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:45 PM
Thursday

From The Hill.

On Thursday, a federal judge based in Washington, D.C., ordered the Justice Department to unredact additional pages of the Epstein files in a suit brought by attorney and independent journalist Katie Phang.

The preliminary injunction orders redactions be removed in key documents of interest in the files, including “at least eight email exchanges with Mr. Epstein regarding a ‘torture video’ and sexual activity with young women, including minors” as well as interviews with a woman who said she was abused by President Trump as a minor.

“The Attorney General’s arguments are unpersuasive. First, Ms. Phang has identified ‘some concrete consequences of not receiving the information.’ She has identified ‘half a dozen stories she is currently unable to report’ because the Attorney General has not disclosed the information,” U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in a decision that also found Phang had a right to bring the case under the Administrative Procedures Act.

He also rebuffed the idea that Phang could have simply requested the documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), noting that the department itself had previously said the Epstein Files Transparency Act “directed a much broader and less redacted release of the files than would have been made under the FOIA. Certain exemptions which may have been made under FOIA were not made” in the Epstein Act release.
Hot stuff. usonian Thursday #1
Great ruling. Though B.See Thursday #2
"torture video" Dave Bowman Thursday #3
Yes. Codifer Thursday #5
With These People? GB_RN Thursday #9
Yes, I was thinking the same thing PatSeg 16 hrs ago #21
Unfortunately your logic is not flawed. FalloutShelter 18 hrs ago #16
So often such people think they know what they want, PatSeg 16 hrs ago #22
Exactly right. FalloutShelter 11 hrs ago #27
Way to go, Katie!!! Yay! BComplex Thursday #4
It was signed into law last year. warmfeet Thursday #6
"We tolerate everything it appears." OldBaldy1701E 18 hrs ago #15
I am surprised the complete files still exist misanthrope 15 hrs ago #24
The courts are proving to be a check and balance - often...but not often enough. yellow dahlia Thursday #7
Fantastic! BeneteauBum Thursday #8
I suspect at least, one Shit-Bag may have a little hard time to fall asleep tonight.. chouchou Thursday #10
Thank you Katie Phang and Judge Emmett Sullivan FakeNoose Thursday #11
Let's go! Akakoji Thursday #12
just saw this on bsky -- here's the doc link/pdf orleans Thursday #13
Phang is great SocialDemocrat61 20 hrs ago #14
"They" will never release all of the Epstein Files. Botany 17 hrs ago #17
Axis Of Evil! czarjak 17 hrs ago #18
Looks good on paper. It will never materialize in this decade. QueerDuck 16 hrs ago #19
Fabulous malaise 16 hrs ago #20
Awesome! Will they comply ??? eom Exp 15 hrs ago #23
DOJ will ignore the ruling Quanto Magnus 12 hrs ago #25
Katie full expects them to appeal hookaleft 12 hrs ago #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Katie Phang jus...»Reply #1