Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The system is broken because... [View all]DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,538 posts)33. 30,000 isn't the cap on district size
The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative;
Its the minimum district size. The Constitution bars having more than 1 Representative for every 30,000 people. It doesn't prevent larger numbers of people per Representative, it only gives a minimum.There was concern about having a overly large and unruly legislature, so they made a minimum district size of 30,000 to give an effective ceiling on how many Representatives there are.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it's gerrymandering and Republican voters that are part crazy, part unthinking "always vote Republican"
muriel_volestrangler
Yesterday
#26
The Powell Memo of 1971 galvanized corporate involvement in politics, education and culture generally.
Another Jackalope
8 hrs ago
#59
In 1933, Justice Louis Brandeis said: "We can have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth
sop
Yesterday
#6
Congress, under Turtle's direction, destroyed the Supreme Court, making it into a politicized collection of unabashed...
NNadir
Yesterday
#7
To contest this, I note we have an obviously insane, corrupt, ignorant, criminal, thug at the head of our Government...
NNadir
Yesterday
#23
The 2nd Amendment is an Artifact Representing Why the Existing Constitution, Already Dead at the Hands of Roberts...
NNadir
Yesterday
#36
I gave my reasons for stating that for all of its successes, it's worn out, in another post. My son gave me a book...
NNadir
21 hrs ago
#42
He is however, an incompetent, racist, senile, corrupt, uneducated, misogynist adjudicated rapist running a large...
NNadir
8 hrs ago
#58
Our system relies on public servants with competence, ethics, and allegiance to our Constitution
Martin Eden
Yesterday
#8
No. Populists (psuedo-populist Trump/others) say the system is broken, rigged, terrible, and blame Democrats.
betsuni
Yesterday
#10
When half can't read at a 6th grade level and don't even know what America250 is for
Ponietz
Yesterday
#12
It's been Party Over Country for a while now. A parliamentary system might have been better for us as the U.S. grew in
Exp
Yesterday
#27
That old saying MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL shines brigjhter today than it ever has.
bluestarone
Yesterday
#29
I'm almost on autopilot. If I don't know a word/phrase I'll look it up (usually WIkipedia)
erronis
14 hrs ago
#52
The Founders built the system to create wins through compromise, not domination
31j20b3
21 hrs ago
#43