Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DFW

(60,901 posts)
71. At first, neither did I, but it soon became clear
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 01:13 AM
5 hrs ago

The higher up they were, the more likely they were to have traveled abroad, and met with a variety of foreigners, including even some Cuban exiles. The government official that invited me was a guy I had met at a conference in London. I had lived in Spain and majored in Spanish in college. I never even found out how this guy’s English was. We spoke only Spanish from the minute we met. Some of the limousine riders spoke passable Russian from having received “political training” in Brezhnev’s Soviet Union, but it was mostly just Spanish.

If you travel and get to speak with people you are not likely to meet at home, you will be exposed to other ideas, other media. Ordinary Cubans couldn’t do that. High government officials could. They cherished their privileges dearly, but they did not lock themselves in their hotel rooms at night to read from Marx and Engels. They read newspapers out of Spain, and talked with people from around the world. They knew what was going on.

To have gotten as far as they did, they had to have been true believers in the beginning. Otherwise, they never would have risen as high as they did in the party’s hierarchy. But with contact with the world outside the Soviet empire came awareness and contact with people who were not limited to saying only what they were told to say and hearing only what they were told to hear. Their man that I met in London wore a suit that was more expensive than any I have ever worn in my life, although I was never one for “proper attire.” He had made it to the point where he was considered useful enough to the country to travel, and he made good use of his opportunity. He said that he absolutely considered himself a “socialista,” but in 1982 Cuba, no one who wanted to be more than a janitor couldn’t well say anything different.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's right Fiendish Thingy Thursday #1
I have been saying this over and over for the 8 years (today is my 8 year anniversary) I have been on DU Celerity Thursday #16
Happy Anniversary SocialDemocrat61 Thursday #30
thanks so much Celerity Thursday #35
What's the difference? Farmer-Rick Thursday #17
It's more than semantics Fiendish Thingy Thursday #23
I agree AZProgressive Thursday #2
And, believe it or not, as president, Biden was the closest to a Keynesian since LBJ. Fiendish Thingy Thursday #24
Like when the Danish PM reminded someone that Denmark's a market economy, not socialist. betsuni Thursday #3
That reminds me of a quote from Tom Souzzi AZProgressive Thursday #7
These secret conspire & whine cocktail parties sound intriguing. betsuni Thursday #36
Oh, and same revolution person said attendees at such Democratic events are "older, whiter, and wealthier" betsuni Friday #43
Not only that DFW Friday #44
I forgot the canapes: "Some of the wealthiest members of the political establishment are hiding behind closed doors betsuni Friday #57
When I hear canapes, I always think caviar, which I hate DFW Friday #58
I love the Scandinavian smoked cod roe caviar that comes in tubes (any seafood-mayo or cheese in tubes). betsuni Friday #61
I used to get this a lot in France in the 1960s, from many 18 year old experts on the USA who had never been there DFW Friday #63
Interesting experiences! electric_blue68 9 hrs ago #69
At first, neither did I, but it soon became clear DFW 5 hrs ago #71
Norman Thomas, perennial socialist candidate, knew FDR was not a Socialist DBoon Friday #59
More of us every day. BlueTsunami2018 Thursday #4
Socialism represents public power. Of course Emile Thursday #5
Absolutely, and, I'm tired of the bad faith false choice. Oneironaut Thursday #6
But MAGA morons believe Fox, and Trump, and SInclaire radio, NewsMax etc. They're dumb and hateful people ChicagoTeamster Thursday #8
Great, just please stop using the term "socialist." Say "Democrat." Period. Auggie Thursday #9
Doesn't matter SurfLiberal Thursday #10
That word can rally their troops. Like your idea -- stay home. Auggie Thursday #25
Doesn't mean you have to call yourself one Boo1 Thursday #26
Sorta like the Nordic model Joinfortmill Thursday #11
social democracy is a foundation for our Nordic Model (I am in Sweden) Celerity Thursday #13
The elephant in the room that is not being addressed here.. ananda Thursday #12
This message was self-deleted by its author applegrove Thursday #14
It is called liberalism in Canada. applegrove Thursday #15
The Liberal Party of Canada is not a social democratic party, the New Democratic Party is the social democratic party. Celerity Thursday #27
They could have had Polliviere Callie1979 Friday #51
Economically, Carney is making multiple moves that are similar to what Poilievre would do, Celerity Friday #54
Small "L" liberalism Fiendish Thingy Thursday #29
Used to be called that in the US, too. wnylib Thursday #37
Then the neocons took away the word liberal by making it derogatory. applegrove Thursday #38
I refused to have it taken from me. There is nothing wrong wnylib Friday #41
Liberal and Socialist have been tainted by the Rs and their Big Media 31j20b3 Thursday #18
John Steinbeck quote anamnua Thursday #19
And that was many decades BEFORE Fox Noise. DFW Friday #53
As soon as the Govt starts bailing out failed "free market" Capitalism, any argument against Govt social programs ToxMarz Thursday #20
Right you are. Tax breaks for corporations is just a direct applegrove Thursday #22
That's a consequence of financial deregulations that wnylib Thursday #39
Regulated capitalism saw capitalism as an economic tool. Capitlists seek to unleash it as a form of governance. ToxMarz Friday #42
yup Skittles Friday #45
It doesn't matter Cirsium Thursday #21
Too many FASCISTS in the U.S! Remember in WWII, it was the fascists who REALLY hated the socialists. eom Exp Thursday #28
In The Third Reich, they merged DFW Friday #46
Absolutely. SamuelAdams Thursday #31
I have a confession to make SocialDemocrat61 Thursday #32
Same here. I have always said that I am a liberal Dem to the left of center, but wnylib Friday #40
It gets complicated when you say As In Europe. DFW Friday #47
Most American voters don't have that background understanding wnylib Friday #55
Pretty sad when affordable day care, affordable rent, and affordable transportation are called "socialism". Bluetus Thursday #33
Sad and disingenuous as well. DFW Friday #48
Krugman is tops BaronChocula Thursday #34
And the supposedly business-friendly Republicans cut Obama's business Stimulus package in half DFW Friday #49
Scumbags BaronChocula Friday #50
It is a mentality we will never understand, and they exploit that to the max DFW Friday #52
"but they are grateful for our reluctance to do so" BaronChocula Friday #60
I have run into Gingrich a few times, but never really talked to him. DFW Friday #65
He's very wrong TVguyCards Friday #56
I think most people voting for candidates to get universal applegrove Friday #62
I wouldn't be so sure TVguyCards Friday #64
"make the argument that workers should own the means of production" EX500rider Friday #66
Ahh I was expecting you to say that :) TVguyCards Friday #67
So the short answer is there have been no economically successful socialists countries? EX500rider Friday #68
I can say back in NYC in the early 1970s there were some Socialists. I know because.... electric_blue68 9 hrs ago #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There Are Very Few Social...»Reply #71