Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(41,327 posts)
2. If "security" requires your face, finger, or retina, does it require that it/they actually be attached to your body ?
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 04:10 PM
11 hrs ago

Criminals have already come up with their own answers to this question.

This was much discussed in fiction in previous decades. Remember "Thunderball" (1961 novel, 1965 movie) in which a pilot of a nuclear bomber "donates" his eyeball -- and thus retina -- to one of the bad guys ? I'm pretty sure stolen fingertips are already a "thing".

Remember Condoleezza Rice's infamous "No one could have imagined ..." statement after 9/11 ? No one could imagine terrorists crashing airliners into buildings, despite a few novels, a TV-movie, and considerable public discussion about very similar possibilities. Failure of imagination seems to be surprisingly widespread among those responsible for security in one theatre or another -- or perhaps overconfidence is just an authoritarian trait.

Before tech companies introduce new security "features", they need to query a few Death Row inmates about how they would deal with their proposals. The people introducing the technology have potential-profit-induced tunnel vision and a lack of imagination -- at least of the type needed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Activist Headquarters»Why You Should Stop Using...»Reply #2