Latest Breaking News

Smackdown2019

(1,358 posts)

15. Who says the photo was from their server?

Thu Apr 18, 2024, 09:13 AM

Apr 2024

1. That photo could from anyone.
2. Dropped at her feet is not serving. They must ask if they are who they are to be served and then present the subpoena.
3. Was there mutiple people there during alleged serving? If so, she may not know their presents as if any other fan, thus was not a proper service.
4. H-hour and we are now hearing about this?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Joe_michigan IbogaProject SunSeeker Arger68 NanaCat

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump lawyers say Stormy Daniels refused subpoena outside a Brooklyn bar, papers left 'at her feet' [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 2024 OP

She can make an argument of "incomplete service". no_hypocrisy Apr 2024 #1

That argument would go nowhere. former9thward Apr 2024 #3

Assuming a judge with the utmost in integrity. nt BootinUp Apr 2024 #7

Wrong. She did not "physically refuse service." It appears she did not even notice the douchebag. SunSeeker Apr 2024 #17

Daniels is at the heart of the case. former9thward Apr 2024 #21

No, Trump's fraud is the heart of the case. SunSeeker Apr 2024 #24

The details as you explained says it all. Process server failed. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #28

She can azureblue Apr 2024 #13

What claim of eye contact? The process server admitted she did not even acknowledge him. SunSeeker Apr 2024 #19

Who the hell drops papers on the floor whathehell Apr 2024 #27

I could come up with some names. Considering how the J6 insurrectionists acted there are many. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #29

Perhaps the better question is.. whathehell Apr 2024 #39

Isn't "incomplete service" MurrayDelph Apr 2024 #35

Surprise surprise The Wizard Apr 2024 #2

Like that last line ... Those in Nebraska white sheets would go crazy if true Traurigkeit Apr 2024 #4

Shout it from the rooftops The Wizard Apr 2024 #42

More performance "art"... 2naSalit Apr 2024 #5

And this is coming out now? Why not when it happened? Raven123 Apr 2024 #6

Because they expected delays due to motions pre jury selection, and then further delays Prairie Gates Apr 2024 #11

Very good point. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #30

...Trump's lawyers are asking Judge Juan M. Merchan to force Daniels to comply with the subpoena. riversedge Apr 2024 #8

As jury selection proceeds unfettered, they come up with other delay tactics Prairie Gates Apr 2024 #9

This judge has likely had it with tsf waiting till beyond the last minute to raise these issues... getagrip_already Apr 2024 #10

If the issue were valid couldn't they deliver the papers to her lawyer? We've seen that they do not play by the rules Ford_Prefect Apr 2024 #12

Why serve her with a subpoena? What's the purpose, other than to intimidate her? FakeNoose Apr 2024 #14

Who says the photo was from their server? Smackdown2019 Apr 2024 #15

Another delay tactic, one that should fail. Why bring it up so, so late? machoneman Apr 2024 #16

Why should nazi party members be upset if a subpoena is ignored? area51 Apr 2024 #18

With regards to him and Stormy, it is likely another case of "premature" something... 4lbs Apr 2024 #20

Just like Trump to use a cut-rate, unprofessional process server to save a buck that he didn't even pay for. Mawspam2 Apr 2024 #22

I don't know, folks, from what the NY rules say, it looks like she was served... Joinfortmill Apr 2024 #23

No, it doesn't NanaCat Apr 2024 #25

If we are interested there are sites LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #33

No. The rules can get complicated and there are lots of links. I just voiced my opinion based on what I read. Joinfortmill Apr 2024 #36

There are very clear instructions... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #26

So ignoring a subpoena is wrong, except when Trump does it? Clash City Rocker Apr 2024 #31

"I'm curious as to why they would want her to testify." BumRushDaShow Apr 2024 #32

Me too. The trial is not about her. She was not there when he falsified business records. appleannie1 Apr 2024 #34

I had merely quoted the person I replied to BumRushDaShow Apr 2024 #37

I am waiting to see him sitting in jail without access to his phone appleannie1 Apr 2024 #38

If you had followed the Sam Bankman-Fried FTX case and trial BumRushDaShow Apr 2024 #40

It's witness intimidation, and an attempt to step on her movie premiere. SunSeeker Apr 2024 #43

Exactly! BumRushDaShow Apr 2024 #44

Did they have the correct person, this time. republianmushroom Apr 2024 #41