Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Karasu

(1,388 posts)

8. I don't know anymore. After all, the Senate replaced the AI regulation ban provision with another one that's

Reply to TomSlick (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 9, 2025, 11:33 PM

Jun 9

essentially just as bad (states can't regulate AI if they want federal funding). I'm not sure they would have bothered doing that if they expected Byrd-Bath to remove it.

I'd like to believe that's true, but this is getting very unnerving.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Republicans quietly slip 'religious freedom' clause into funding bill [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 9 OP

Ban all unrelated riders and provisions from legislation. This shit has been the GOP's "secret" weapon for far too Karasu Jun 9 #1

That's a weird and narrow enough definition of "religious freedom" to violate the Establishment clause. n/t TygrBright Jun 9 #2

That's just what I was thinking, too... they sure as heck aren't going to make sure slightlv Jun 9 #7

Religious freedom for whom? Norrrm Jun 9 #3

Well, it sure isn't because they have any morals or ethics. Praise be. walkingman Jun 9 #4

Marriage has nothing to do with "belief" Nigrum Cattus Jun 9 #5

Non-fiscal stuff should take this out of the reconciliation process. TomSlick Jun 9 #6

I don't know anymore. After all, the Senate replaced the AI regulation ban provision with another one that's Karasu Jun 9 #8