Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

groundloop

(13,413 posts)
Tue Aug 12, 2025, 11:22 AM Aug 2025

Supreme Court formally asked to overturn landmark same-sex marriage ruling [View all]

Source: ABC News

Ten years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights to same-sex couples nationwide, the justices this fall will consider for the first time whether to take up a case that explicitly asks them to overturn that decision.

Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees.

In a petition for writ of certiorari filed last month, Davis argues First Amendment protection for free exercise of religion immunizes her from personal liability for the denial of marriage licenses.

More fundamentally, she claims the high court's decision in Obergefell v Hodges -- extending marriage rights for same-sex couples under the 14th Amendment's due process protections -- was "egregiously wrong."

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-formally-asked-overturn-landmark-same-sex/story?id=124465302

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kim Davis needs to be thrown in the dumpster and forgotten about. What a miserable POS that woman is. Initech Aug 2025 #1
She is. I love the way you described her, in one short sentence, in seven words. Simple, to the point, and precise. SWBTATTReg Aug 2025 #6
So well stated. TY! electric_blue68 Aug 2025 #9
I don't understand how these Supremes can keep overturning former Supreme's rulings Bayard Aug 2025 #2
Because they can. North Coast Lawyer Aug 2025 #8
Ohhh, so THAT'S what -Marbury v. Madison- is about. (Not a lawyer) electric_blue68 Aug 2025 #10
Marbury v. Madison is consistent with the Constitution's Article III, Specifically, "The judicial Power shall extend to 24601 Aug 2025 #12
Two Edged Sword North Coast Lawyer Aug 2025 #13
Marbury was required. Igel Aug 2025 #16
Like Now? North Coast Lawyer Aug 2025 #18
Lots of precedents were overturned. Igel Aug 2025 #15
Religious extremism ZDU Aug 2025 #3
But it's okay for drumpf to want to screw his daughter. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2025 #4
A PANDORA'S BOX Jimvanhise Aug 2025 #5
'Davis is seen as one of the only Americans Oeditpus Rex Aug 2025 #7
Mind your own fucking business, Karen. LudwigPastorius Aug 2025 #11
If the SC fucks this up, bluestarone Aug 2025 #14
6-3. Count on it. Boomerproud Aug 2025 #17
I'm gonna kill people who do fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil desire,,,,just for fun. chouchou Aug 2025 #19
There's enough love in the world for you too, Karen. mahina Aug 2025 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court formally as...