Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,232 posts)
14. Doesn't that rather imply that to be on the streets in DC
Thu Nov 27, 2025, 01:31 PM
Thursday

is to be a "potential victim"?

And couldn't "that person shouldn't have ever been there" apply to any innocent victim in a way that basically avoids saying that there's a murderer but, ya know, let's not talk about that person.

Why would somebody shoot a guardsman any more than anybody else unless they swallowed some 'background noise' about fighting fascists and resisting the occupation? I mean, that kind of talk never hurt anybody, not really.

Have to wonder about the early "allahu akbar" claim, though. It's dropped out of the reporting--is that because it's false or impolitic?

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So now the asshole will be sending more guns to the streets. Brilliant. Walleye Thursday #1
Also sending more potential victims to the streets. Those NG shouldn't have ever been there. RockRaven Thursday #5
Doesn't that rather imply that to be on the streets in DC Igel Thursday #14
You can spin any tale you can imagine, since the evidence for motive at this point is nil. RockRaven Thursday #15
Motive is not an element of proof required for conviction. Intent is. n/t 24601 5 hrs ago #24
Total non sequitur. Not relevant to my post in any way. nt RockRaven 4 hrs ago #25
Why was Fox and other RW outlets stating yesterday both were dead? GreenWave Thursday #2
That's what they were hoping. Then they could exploit it. ChicagoTeamster Thursday #8
No surprise that Pirro can't talk motive... Hugin Thursday #3
"brazen act of violence" - thanks for the dramatization, AP! SaydiTom Thursday #4
Wait until he claims POW status! James48 Thursday #6
No uniform, an unlawful combatant... GJGCA Thursday #11
Wasn't aware the US & Afghanistan were still at war. EX500rider Thursday #13
The authorization for use of force continues in effect. James48 Thursday #16
Just guessing here, but i'm thinking this was because of religion. bluestarone Thursday #7
What has been made known about his religious beliefs? ClaudetteCC Thursday #12
Think he was operating under direction of his CIA handlers? ChicagoTeamster Thursday #9
the results of betrayal. WhiteTara Thursday #10
Probably figured he'd do better in a U.S. B.O.P. facility Stacey Grove Yesterday #17
I wonder if he thought that far ahead WhiteTara Yesterday #18
He'd likely be killed in Afghanistan Stacey Grove Yesterday #19
exactly. That's the betrayal WhiteTara Yesterday #20
Charges have been upgraded Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 21 hrs ago #21
How did he get a gun ? JI7 16 hrs ago #22
huh? Skittles 15 hrs ago #23
Seriously? Anybody who wants a gun can get one. Ocelot II 4 hrs ago #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Afghan national charged i...»Reply #14