Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

xocetaceans

(4,442 posts)

8. So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? What . . .

Reply to TheRickles (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 12:31 PM

Dec 2025

. . . gives you such confidence in that ability and what about the other "miniscule [sic]" numbers of transmission cases? Do you think that those are transmissions are fine?

Out of about 3,600,000 newborns per year in the US, how many constitute that minuscule number of transmissions that you would accept and tolerate as fine? What do you wish on them in lieu of a safe and effective vaccination against such an eminently avoidable disease?

RFK, Jr. is not correct and is wholly unqualified and is pathetically incompetent as the leader of HHS.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SunSeeker

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US vaccine advisers say not all babies need a hepatitis B shot at birth [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 OP

Illinois has enacted snowybirdie Dec 2025 #1

Parents should demand their pediatricians follow the Illinois vaccination schedule. FarPoint Dec 2025 #3

There are a couple "regional" health alliances/colaboratives BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #5

And yet he might be right about this one. TheRickles Dec 2025 #2

Agree on this one vaccine- totally unnecessary unless the mother was at risk as a drug abuser biophile Dec 2025 #4

So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? xocetaceans Dec 2025 #10

No, it's not for me personally to decide biophile Dec 2025 #12

To be clearer, my post indicates that the knowledge a person needs to have in order to carry out what you seem . . . xocetaceans Dec 2025 #21

Definitely not a libertarian or anti-vax; no ax to grind biophile Dec 2025 #22

Some HepB + mothers aren't tested. Or they have false-negative results. mainer Dec 2025 #6

Asian Americans are at higher risk. deurbano Dec 2025 #7

So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? What . . . xocetaceans Dec 2025 #8

Utter hogwash. You don't know what you're talking about. PSPS Dec 2025 #13

Wait a minute... maybe I misunderstood you... slightlv Dec 2025 #16

What damage does giving every baby the Hep B vaccine cause? NickB79 Dec 2025 #20

I should say that Magatry is a murder-suicide cult. ananda Dec 2025 #9

I think waiting till babies are older is a good idea womanofthehills Dec 2025 #11

Oh, please. The liver damage can already be happeinig before babies "are older." PSPS Dec 2025 #14

Fevers are scary. But they are only one indicator in a myriad of symptoms used to diagnose problems. ... littlemissmartypants Dec 2025 #17

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a baby killer. nt SunSeeker Dec 2025 #15

So which ones will need it then? mdbl Dec 2025 #18

In a brutal week for public health, the chairman on the Senate health committee could act. So why doesn't he? https://bs LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #19