Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,463 posts)
9. That is what I've also concluded after carefully watching the whole story unfold
Sun Feb 8, 2026, 12:13 PM
Feb 8

I could lay out the evidence that underpins this analysis (it doesn't 'prove' it, but suggests it), but it would annoy many people so I won't. I hope you'll believe me when I say it's honestly well-considered, and that I would be more than happy to jump on the bandwagon to believe what everyone else does, if the evidence ever truly warrants it.

A lot of the reasons behind this though I will say stem from the testimonies in Maxwell's 2022 trial, which I consider to offer the highest level of credibility, due to everyone being under oath in a closely-watched federal criminal trial

OTOH, I also strongly suspect he and Brunel were recruiting models and actresses (who were 18+) from all over the world to come and party at Epstein Island and elsewhere, and I'm sure a lot of what happened there is rightly called "sex trafficking", so I disagree with the headline, and think the word "minors" should be part of it.

I think he was trafficking young women, and privately abusing minor girls, rather than sharing them with his rich buddies, with the likely exception of Virginia Guiffre.

In the public imagination, IMHO, these two things (abusing minors, trafficking 18-25 year olds to his rich buddies) have become conflated into one storyline, but I don't think that version of the story is particularly accurate.

Let the flames begin.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What load of bullshit UpInArms Feb 8 #1
Was this before or after Bill Barr destroyed the evidence? FakeNoose Feb 8 #2
Captives don't have to be told what's expected of them. underpants Feb 8 #3
Whitewashing at its finest. Ritabert Feb 8 #4
Seriously? ._. Feb 8 #5
It's J. Edgar Hoover's on steroids. quaint Feb 8 #19
My father's FBI... GiqueCee Feb 8 #33
So, I guess all those politicians in Europe who are resigning from their posts MLWR Feb 8 #6
Just one more example of the FBI's lack of credibility under Trump. patphil Feb 8 #7
It's now official that there ain't a cow in Texas. raccoon Feb 8 #8
The longhorns have up and vanished! electric_blue68 Feb 8 #30
That is what I've also concluded after carefully watching the whole story unfold AZJonnie Feb 8 #9
I have to ask... 2naSalit Feb 8 #11
Yes I have, and yes I have paid a considerable attention to details, though I may've missed something AZJonnie Feb 8 #23
Did you forget the sarcsm thingy? niyad Feb 8 #14
First thing i thought of after reading your post bluestarone Feb 8 #16
Yes, I suppose I'd be as terrible at it as 17 years worth of federal prosecutors across 5 POTUS terms (nt) AZJonnie Feb 8 #24
I think I understand what you're saying FakeNoose Feb 8 #32
That's the jist yes, but I also think he and Brunel were at least in some sense trafficking young women AZJonnie Feb 9 #35
And it don't rain in Indianapolis in the summertime usonian Feb 8 #10
I can't believe the AP would report that oldmanlynn Feb 8 #12
Bovine Excrement! Pas-de-Calais Feb 8 #13
Not Borowitz or The Onion catrose Feb 8 #15
The same FBI that found no evidence of sexual abuse by Bret Kavanaugh. SunSeeker Feb 8 #17
The FBI might very well have concluded this. malthaussen Feb 8 #18
Sounds more like they aren't incorruptible. mdbl Feb 8 #20
I won't quibble. n/t malthaussen Feb 8 #21
This is the type of BS we can expect from the newly revamped Fascist Bureau of Intimidation. nt yaesu Feb 8 #22
Let me guess. It was just a different kind of chapter of the Boy Scouts and they were working on a merit badge. Vinca Feb 8 #25
Wait, what? They're gonna push this bullshit? purr-rat beauty Feb 8 #26
We need the names of the FBI people who said this... Escape Feb 8 #27
Sure, Jan. Scrivener7 Feb 8 #28
Well that's good enough for me, nothing else to see here. Buddyzbuddy Feb 8 #29
This is their next tactic. Pretend they have no evidence. LiberalLovinLug Feb 8 #31
The Patel FBI? Mysterian Feb 8 #34
found no connection to criminal activity, said another internal memo in 2019. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 9 #36
"they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men" LudwigPastorius Feb 9 #37
So why did Maxwell take the 5th? Nt RussBLib Feb 9 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI concluded Jeffrey Eps...»Reply #9