Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ToxMarz

(2,819 posts)

5. If they had properly redacted and released the required documents

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:39 AM

19 hrs ago

tracking the unredacted congressional searches would be a moot point and unremarkable. Their defense of 'protecting the victim's personal information' would be valid and reasonable. But of course they didn't do that.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

oberle travelingthrulife FakeNoose

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Epstein Files Update: DOJ Responds to Tracking Searches by Lawmakers [View all] BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago OP

I am not sure how tracking searches protects any except one professional victim from exposure. Hugin 22 hrs ago #1

If a victim's name were leaked, they would know who would have been in a position to have leaked it. thesquanderer 19 hrs ago #6

Good. They should be able to determine who in the DoJ exposed all the victims names Jarqui 22 hrs ago #2

It's not likely - it's only 4 computers specifically made available to the Dem committee members FakeNoose 19 hrs ago #7

"Not likely" ? Jarqui 19 hrs ago #8

That's rich! mdbl 20 hrs ago #3

The bullshit never stops orangecrush 20 hrs ago #4

If they had properly redacted and released the required documents ToxMarz 19 hrs ago #5

I guess they mean the perps are victims. KPN 15 hrs ago #9

This. They wouldn't waste their time logging searches for any other reason. JudyM 10 hrs ago #10