Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge says Pete Hegseth is unlawfully retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly over 'illegal orders' video [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(177,271 posts)25. MaddowBlog-After a judge sided with Mark Kelly, what happens to Pete Hegseth's crusade?
The sooner the Pentagon chief and the rest of the Trump administration move on from this fiasco, the better off everyone will be.
After a judge sided with Mark Kelly, what happens to Pete Hegsethâs crusade?
— Donna898 (@donna-f898.bsky.social) 2026-02-14T18:01:28.412Z
The sooner the Pentagon chief and the rest of the Trump administration move on from this fiasco, the better off everyone will be. Pete hegseth is another little trump bitch.
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/after-a-judge-sided-with-mark-kelly-what-happens-to-pete-hegseths-crusade
In mid-December, the Pentagon announced that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was escalating his crusade against Sen. Mark Kelly, launching an official Command Investigation into the Arizona Democrat. It was, as The Washington Post noted soon after, an unprecedented use of the military justice system to investigate a political adversary......
If the former Fox News host had his hopes up, he has reason to be disappointed. MS NOW reported:
Secretary Hegseth relies on the well-established doctrine that military servicemembers enjoy less vigorous First Amendment protections given the fundamental obligation for obedience and discipline in the armed forces, the George W. Bush-appointed jurist wrote in his 29-page opinion.
Unfortunately for Secretary Hegseth, no court has ever extended those principles to retired servicemembers, much less a retired servicemember serving in Congress and exercising oversight responsibility over the military, the judge added. This Court will not be the first to do so!.....
Hegseths failure dovetails with one of his former Fox colleagues, Jeanine Pirro, whos currently the top federal prosecutor in the nations capital, authorizing prosecutors this week to try to persuade a grand jury to indict Kelly and his congressional colleagues on charges of seditious conspiracy.
That didnt go well: Regular citizens on the grand jury rejected the ridiculous gambit on Tuesday. In fact, MS NOW confirmed that literally zero members of the grand jury were inclined to go along with the partisan scheme.
The sooner Hegseth and the rest of the Trump administration move on from this fiasco, the better off everyone will be.
If the former Fox News host had his hopes up, he has reason to be disappointed. MS NOW reported:
A federal judge temporarily blocked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday from censuring Sen. Mark Kelly or reducing his military pension over a video reminding troops to refuse illegal orders.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leons preliminary injunction prevents Hegseth from taking those actions or reducing Kellys rank as a retired Navy captain.
Secretary Hegseth relies on the well-established doctrine that military servicemembers enjoy less vigorous First Amendment protections given the fundamental obligation for obedience and discipline in the armed forces, the George W. Bush-appointed jurist wrote in his 29-page opinion.
Unfortunately for Secretary Hegseth, no court has ever extended those principles to retired servicemembers, much less a retired servicemember serving in Congress and exercising oversight responsibility over the military, the judge added. This Court will not be the first to do so!.....
Hegseths failure dovetails with one of his former Fox colleagues, Jeanine Pirro, whos currently the top federal prosecutor in the nations capital, authorizing prosecutors this week to try to persuade a grand jury to indict Kelly and his congressional colleagues on charges of seditious conspiracy.
That didnt go well: Regular citizens on the grand jury rejected the ridiculous gambit on Tuesday. In fact, MS NOW confirmed that literally zero members of the grand jury were inclined to go along with the partisan scheme.
The sooner Hegseth and the rest of the Trump administration move on from this fiasco, the better off everyone will be.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Judge says Pete Hegseth is unlawfully retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly over 'illegal orders' video [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
OP
I would love to see Hegseth get sued by Kelly. Harassment, frivolous and malicious prosecution, defamation.
Midnight Writer
Thursday
#4
He had to. That is its legal name. The judge's ruling must be legally accurate.
SunSeeker
Thursday
#8
Pete Hegseth handed loss as GOP-appointed judge blocks move to reduce veteran Dem's rank
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
#18
"Hegseth has radicalized the most conservative partisanly Republican judge not appointed by Trump I've ever met"
muriel_volestrangler
Thursday
#20
MaddowBlog-After a judge sided with Mark Kelly, what happens to Pete Hegseth's crusade?
LetMyPeopleVote
Yesterday
#25