Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy [View all]wnylib
(25,427 posts)44. EMERGENCY ALERT!!
Ketchup bottles in flight.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
There is another law that allows a president to impose tariffs in an "emergency"
Fiendish Thingy
Yesterday
#13
I would be surprised if that "limited strike" didn't happen this weekend
BumRushDaShow
10 hrs ago
#86
Like other Republicans they aim more towards the middle of his cheeks and it involves their tongues more than their lips
cstanleytech
Yesterday
#7
So, they gave him the idea that he had immunity, and now it's their privilege to pull back
Baitball Blogger
Yesterday
#5
For Alito and Thomas to dissent is obvious, but for Kavanaugh to do so is really telling
Prairie Gates
Yesterday
#8
No surprise that the nazi enablers, alito, thomas, and kavanaugh disented. They don't believe in
lostincalifornia
Yesterday
#11
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court rules Trump doesn't have the tariff authority he claimed
LetMyPeopleVote
Yesterday
#33
Roberts delivered the opinion/judgment of the Court. Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissent.🚨
riversedge
Yesterday
#35
Some tariffs were imposed because of 'attitude' of foreign leaders, or judicial actions of nations TSF
wiggs
Yesterday
#37
So is inventing law out of whole cloth an OFFICIAL duty of the president?
bucolic_frolic
Yesterday
#39
Lutnik and his sons (and other Wall Streeters) will make "astronomical sums" from this SC decision.
sop
Yesterday
#43
I honestly don't believe that the companies deserve to get much if any money back.
cstanleytech
Yesterday
#47
Trump should have to pay refunds out of his personal fortune to all of us.
Linda ladeewolf
Yesterday
#48
The class actions where the lawyers pocket a substantial portion and the plaintiffs get a token amount?
MichMan
Yesterday
#73
Columbia didn't pay the tariffs; you did....to the federal government. Columbia was disenfranchised by the tariffs
NowsTheTime
21 hrs ago
#78
So you're saying all the American Importing companies kept the tariff money?
FakeNoose
21 hrs ago
#80
I can't say for sure I guess .....and no, we will never get the money back, Federal gov't collected it.
NowsTheTime
20 hrs ago
#81
It looks like the political hacks on this "court," if we call this arm of legal....
NNadir
Yesterday
#57
Trump will announce that SCOTUS is the deep state & should be dissolved, in 5, 4, 3, ...
aggiesal
Yesterday
#62
So half of the republican members of the Supreme Court still support the Constitution
thought crime
23 hrs ago
#77