Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy [View all]NNadir
(37,677 posts)57. It looks like the political hacks on this "court," if we call this arm of legal....
Last edited Fri Feb 20, 2026, 03:15 PM - Edit history (1)
...revolutionaries in change of dismantling the US Constitution a "court," are starting to see which way the wind is blowing.
If the rule of law is ever reestablished in this country, in spite of their efforts to destroy it, there may be hell to pay.
Certainly the highly corrupt Clarence Thomas should be subject to impeachment, and frat boy Kavanaugh, who perjury himself during the joke of his confirmation hearings should be hell to pay.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
There is another law that allows a president to impose tariffs in an "emergency"
Fiendish Thingy
Yesterday
#13
I would be surprised if that "limited strike" didn't happen this weekend
BumRushDaShow
10 hrs ago
#86
Like other Republicans they aim more towards the middle of his cheeks and it involves their tongues more than their lips
cstanleytech
Yesterday
#7
So, they gave him the idea that he had immunity, and now it's their privilege to pull back
Baitball Blogger
Yesterday
#5
For Alito and Thomas to dissent is obvious, but for Kavanaugh to do so is really telling
Prairie Gates
Yesterday
#8
No surprise that the nazi enablers, alito, thomas, and kavanaugh disented. They don't believe in
lostincalifornia
Yesterday
#11
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court rules Trump doesn't have the tariff authority he claimed
LetMyPeopleVote
Yesterday
#33
Roberts delivered the opinion/judgment of the Court. Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissent.🚨
riversedge
Yesterday
#35
Some tariffs were imposed because of 'attitude' of foreign leaders, or judicial actions of nations TSF
wiggs
Yesterday
#37
So is inventing law out of whole cloth an OFFICIAL duty of the president?
bucolic_frolic
Yesterday
#39
Lutnik and his sons (and other Wall Streeters) will make "astronomical sums" from this SC decision.
sop
Yesterday
#43
I honestly don't believe that the companies deserve to get much if any money back.
cstanleytech
Yesterday
#47
Trump should have to pay refunds out of his personal fortune to all of us.
Linda ladeewolf
Yesterday
#48
The class actions where the lawyers pocket a substantial portion and the plaintiffs get a token amount?
MichMan
Yesterday
#73
Columbia didn't pay the tariffs; you did....to the federal government. Columbia was disenfranchised by the tariffs
NowsTheTime
21 hrs ago
#78
So you're saying all the American Importing companies kept the tariff money?
FakeNoose
21 hrs ago
#80
I can't say for sure I guess .....and no, we will never get the money back, Federal gov't collected it.
NowsTheTime
20 hrs ago
#81
It looks like the political hacks on this "court," if we call this arm of legal....
NNadir
Yesterday
#57
Trump will announce that SCOTUS is the deep state & should be dissolved, in 5, 4, 3, ...
aggiesal
Yesterday
#62
So half of the republican members of the Supreme Court still support the Constitution
thought crime
23 hrs ago
#77