Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

LetMyPeopleVote

(178,249 posts)

35. The Court of Appeals in this case has ruled that Section 122 does not apply

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 09:45 PM

Feb 22

This is the type of ruling by the court of appeals that will be used in the upcoming challenges of trump's use of Section 122

Link to tweet

This section will show up very early in a summary judgement attacking these tariffs.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BumRushDaShow

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump announces new 10% global tariff after raging over Supreme Court loss [View all] BumRushDaShow Feb 20 OP

Um... how does that work? The executive branch will have to pay 10% more for supplies it gets via imports? ck4829 Feb 20 #1

Really? UpInArms Feb 20 #2

thats something he legally can do moonshinegnomie Feb 20 #3

He's gone insane, remove Blues Heron Feb 20 #4

Flush... MarcoZandrini Feb 20 #18

Thank you for your attention to this fecal matter! Blues Heron Feb 20 #22

Yup. Well said! Mr. Evil Feb 20 #29

"We have the right to do pretty much what we want to do." Wednesdays Feb 20 #5

Ali Baba and his 40 thieves Justice matters. Feb 20 #19

Ooooh... BadgerKid Feb 20 #6

And there it is Miguelito Loveless Feb 20 #7

I'd say it's a solid F U SCOTUS. flashman13 Feb 20 #21

Of course popsdenver Feb 20 #32

Translation: Ray Bruns Feb 20 #8

The most basic question: what we tariffs supposed to accomplish? Bluetus Feb 20 #31

He's such a spoiled child sakabatou Feb 20 #9

And we're paying for his tantrums. StarryNite Feb 20 #14

Legal basis? We don't need no stinking legal basis!! moniss Feb 20 #10

I read your words, and you laid out a perfect picture of bluestarone Feb 20 #12

We have the right to do what we want to do. choie Feb 20 #11

"We" being "me, myself and I" in the fat asses case! KPN Feb 20 #17

Will the spineless republican shitbirds in congress and the senate FINALLY do something? NoMoreRepugs Feb 20 #13

They'll kneel down and pucker up some more durablend Feb 20 #15

Why doesn't he just fucking die? Orrex Feb 20 #16

CBS showed the babbling fool. Olympics on NBC. Watch people go downhill one at a time rather than the twodogsbarking Feb 20 #20

He's just declared himself king. Next up: God. Grokenstein Feb 20 #23

With no policing entity willing to step up, why would he heed the court's admonition? Magoo48 Feb 20 #24

Does his new tariff include Penguin Island? Hassler Feb 20 #25

Hasn't anyone figured how to make them a tax deduction? /nt bucolic_frolic Feb 20 #26

So now we've reached the point where he is Figarosmom Feb 20 #27

149 days left of this BS also........he does any and everything to circumvent the rule of law and the adjoining turbinetree Feb 20 #28

The legal ground to use this act to impose such broad tariffs like this, is D. Spaulding Feb 20 #30

Thank you for this rational, informative reply. KY_EnviroGuy Feb 20 #33

Why Trump's Section 122 Tariffs Are Illegal LetMyPeopleVote Feb 21 #34

The Court of Appeals in this case has ruled that Section 122 does not apply LetMyPeopleVote Feb 22 #35