Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

WestMichRad

(3,116 posts)

5. Oops!

Reply to SunSeeker (Reply #2)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 10:01 PM

Sunday

Further evidence that they’re just making up stuff as they go.

I'd put my $1 bet on - no one in the administration has read any of the Trade Act of 1974.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hugin Shipwack

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US will not back out of its tariff deals with UK and others, says Trump trade representative [View all] BumRushDaShow Sunday OP

A contract based on fraud, deception, or illegal acts is null and void bucolic_frolic Sunday #1

Perfect. Too bad it is not today's law instead of Orange Nazi's "law". efhmc Sunday #3

But TACO can't use Section 122 selectively. It must be across the board. SunSeeker Sunday #2

Oops! WestMichRad Sunday #5

First thing I thought too EuterpeThelo 16 hrs ago #6

The Cantaloupe Caligula ignores another group of judges RainCaster Sunday #4

And remains out of jail. travelingthrulife 16 hrs ago #7

Hell, who's gonna know bluestarone 13 hrs ago #8